Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38863953›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2024

Moral Distress Healthcare Providers in Spain: Observational Study.

Marta Mellides González, Marta Elena Losa Iglesias, Inmaculada Corral-Liria, Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, Eva Maria Martinez-Jimenez, Sandra Fares-Medina, Sara González-Martín, Marta San-Antolín, Raquel Jiménez-Fernández

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marta Mellides GonzálezHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Usera, Madrid, 28041, Spain.
Marta Elena Losa IglesiasFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcon, 28922, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7588-2069
Inmaculada Corral-LiriaFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcon, 28922, Spain.
Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-VallejoFacultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1568-7602
Eva Maria Martinez-JimenezFacultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain.
Sandra Fares-MedinaFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcon, 28922, Spain.
Sara González-MartínFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcon, 28922, Spain.
Marta San-AntolínDepartment of Psychology, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, 47002, Spain.
Raquel Jiménez-FernándezFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcon, 28922, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the moral distress (MD)in health professionals of pediatric and adult units to show how the complexity of care in the pediatric field causes the professionals who carry out their activity in these units to present a higher level of moral distress and a worse climate ethical. Design: Observational study with health professionals who currently work in Spanish Hospitals. Methods: A 58-item questionnaire was electronically distributed which included sociodemographic and employment characteristics, the Spanish version of the Measure of Moral Unrest for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP-SPA) and the Hospital Ethical Climate Survey (HECS). Results: A total of 169 health professionals completed the questionnaire. The moral distress was significantly higher among nurses than among physicians and nursing assistant care technicians. Focusing on the type of unit, moral distress it was only significantly higher for those physicians treating adult patients compared to those treating pediatric patients. Regarding the total score of the HECS survey, the medical group shows higher scores compared to the nursing group. Conclusion: Statistically significant differences have been found only in the medical group that treats adult patients, presenting a higher level of moral unrests than the pediatrician group. The MMD-HP-SPA questionnaire is a valid and useful instrument to detect MD in our hospital units in order to be able to implement strategies/interventions that improve the ethical climate and other factors that can mitigate and prevent this MD.

Indexed as

ethical climatemoral unrestpediatricsquestionnairessurveys

Identifiers

PMID38863953
PMCPMC11166161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.