Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38863876›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Prognosis methods of stress corrosion cracking under harsh environmental conditions.

Hasan Hamdan, Abdullah Alsit, Aghyad B Al Tahhan, Omer Mughieda, Abdel-Hamid I Mourad, Mutasem A Shehadeh, Mohammad Alkhedher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hasan HamdanDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, PO 59911, United Arab Emirates.
Abdullah AlsitDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, PO 59911, United Arab Emirates.
Aghyad B Al TahhanDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, PO 59911, United Arab Emirates.
Omer MughiedaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, PO 59911, United Arab Emirates.
Abdel-Hamid I MouradDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, P.O. Box 17555, United Arab Emirates.
Mutasem A ShehadehDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, P.O. Box 50927, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad AlkhedherDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, PO 59911, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) under harsh environmental conditions still poses a significant challenge, despite extensive research efforts. The intricate interplay among mechanical, chemical, and electrochemical factors hinders the accurate prognosis of material degradation and remaining service life. Furthermore, the demand for real-time monitoring and early detection of SCC defects adds further complexity to the prognostication process. Therefore, there is an urgent need for comprehensive review papers that consolidate current knowledge and advancements in prognosis methods. Such reviews would facilitate a better understanding and resolution of the challenges associated with SCC under harsh environmental conditions. This work aims to provide a comprehensive overview of various prognosis methods utilized for the assessment and prediction of SCC in such environments. The paper will delve into the following sections: exacerbating harsh environmental conditions, non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques, electrochemical techniques, numerical modeling, and machine learning. This review is inclined to serve as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working in the field, facilitating the development of effective strategies to mitigate SCC and ensure the integrity and reliability of materials operating in challenging environments. Despite considerable research, stress corrosion cracking in harsh environments remains a critical issue, complicated by the interplay of mechanical, chemical, and electrochemical factors. This review aims to consolidate current prognosis methods, including non-destructive testing, electrochemical techniques, numerical modeling, and machine learning. Key findings indicate that while traditional methods offer limited reliability, emerging computational approaches show promise for real-time, accurate predictions. The paper also briefly discusses notable SCC failure cases to underscore the urgency for improved prognosis techniques. This work aspires to fill knowledge gaps and serve as a resource for developing effective SCC mitigation strategies, thereby ensuring material integrity in challenging operational conditions.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceElectrochemical testingMachine learningSCCSlow strain rateUltrasonic testing

Identifiers

PMID38863876
PMCPMC11165243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.