ReviewHeliyon2024
Prognosis methods of stress corrosion cracking under harsh environmental conditions.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stress Corrosion Cracking: Mechanisms, Materials Challenges, and Engineering Solutions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) under harsh environmental conditions still poses a significant challenge, despite extensive research efforts. The intricate interplay among mechanical, chemical, and electrochemical factors hinders the accurate prognosis of material degradation and remaining service life. Furthermore, the demand for real-time monitoring and early detection of SCC defects adds further complexity to the prognostication process. Therefore, there is an urgent need for comprehensive review papers that consolidate current knowledge and advancements in prognosis methods. Such reviews would facilitate a better understanding and resolution of the challenges associated with SCC under harsh environmental conditions. This work aims to provide a comprehensive overview of various prognosis methods utilized for the assessment and prediction of SCC in such environments. The paper will delve into the following sections: exacerbating harsh environmental conditions, non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques, electrochemical techniques, numerical modeling, and machine learning. This review is inclined to serve as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working in the field, facilitating the development of effective strategies to mitigate SCC and ensure the integrity and reliability of materials operating in challenging environments. Despite considerable research, stress corrosion cracking in harsh environments remains a critical issue, complicated by the interplay of mechanical, chemical, and electrochemical factors. This review aims to consolidate current prognosis methods, including non-destructive testing, electrochemical techniques, numerical modeling, and machine learning. Key findings indicate that while traditional methods offer limited reliability, emerging computational approaches show promise for real-time, accurate predictions. The paper also briefly discusses notable SCC failure cases to underscore the urgency for improved prognosis techniques. This work aspires to fill knowledge gaps and serve as a resource for developing effective SCC mitigation strategies, thereby ensuring material integrity in challenging operational conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.