ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics2021
A Model-free Approach for Testing Association.
Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The question of association between outcome and feature is generally framed in the context of a model based on functional and distributional forms. Our motivating application is that of identifying serum biomarkers of angiogenesis, energy metabolism, apoptosis, and inflammation, predictive of recurrence after lung resection in node-negative non-small cell lung cancer patients with tumor stage T2a or less. We propose an omnibus approach for testing association that is free of assumptions on functional forms and distributions and can be used as a general method. This proposed maximal permutation test is based on the idea of thresholding, is readily implementable and is computationally efficient. We demonstrate that the proposed omnibus tests maintain their levels and have strong power for detecting linear, nonlinear and quantile-based associations, even with outlier-prone and heavy-tailed error distributions and under nonparametric setting. We additionally illustrate the use of this approach in model-free feature screening and further examine the level and power of these tests for binary outcome. We compare the performance of the proposed omnibus tests with comparator methods in our motivating application to identify preoperative serum biomarkers associated with non-small cell lung cancer recurrence in early stage patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.