Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38863729›Full record

ArticleUpsala journal of medical sciences2024

Recommended dosages of analgesic and sedative drugs in intensive care result in a low incidence of potentially toxic blood concentrations.

Ulrica Lennborn, Anna Johansson, Erik Lindgren, Elisabet I Nielsen, Håkan Sandler, Maria Bertilsson, Robert Kronstrand, Johan Ahlner, Fredrik C Kugelberg, Sten Rubertsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Upsala journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ulrica LennbornDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Division of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna JohanssonDepartment of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, National Board of Forensic Medicine, Linköping, Sweden.
Erik LindgrenDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Division of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Elisabet I NielsenDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Håkan SandlerDepartment of Surgical Sciences/Forensic Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Maria BertilssonUppsala Clinical Research Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala Sweden.
Robert KronstrandDepartment of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, National Board of Forensic Medicine, Linköping, Sweden.
Johan AhlnerDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Fredrik C KugelbergDepartment of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, National Board of Forensic Medicine, Linköping, Sweden.
Sten RubertssonDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Division of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Standard dosages of analgesic and sedative drugs are given to intensive care patients. The resulting range of blood concentrations and corresponding clinical responses need to be better examined. The purpose of this study was to describe daily dosages, measured blood concentrations, and clinical responses in critically ill patients. The purpose was also to contribute to establishing whole blood concentration reference values of the drugs investigated. Methods: A descriptive study of prospectively collected data from 302 admissions to a general intensive care unit (ICU) at a university hospital. Ten drugs (clonidine, fentanyl, morphine, dexmedetomidine, ketamine, ketobemidone, midazolam, paracetamol, propofol, and thiopental) were investigated, and daily dosages recorded. Blood samples were collected twice daily, and drug concentrations were measured. Clinical responses were registered using Richmond agitation-sedation scale (RASS) and Numeric rating scale (NRS). Results: Drug dosages were within recommended dose ranges. Blood concentrations for all 10 drugs showed a wide variation within the cohort, but only 3% were above therapeutic interval where clonidine (57 of 122) and midazolam (38 of 122) dominated. RASS and NRS were not correlated to drug concentrations. Conclusion: Using recommended dose intervals for analgesic and sedative drugs in the ICU setting combined with regular monitoring of clinical responses such as RASS and NRS leads to 97% of concentrations being below the upper limit in the therapeutic interval. This study contributes to whole blood drug concentration reference values regarding these 10 drugs.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsHypnotics and SedativesIntensive Care UnitsMidazolamAcetaminophenAdultAgedAged, 80 and overClonidineCritical CareCritical IllnessDexmedetomidineDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFentanylHumansAcetaminophenAnalgesicsClonidineDexmedetomidineFentanylHypnotics and SedativesKetamineMidazolamMorphinePropofolThiopentalAnalgesiacritical caredrug concentrationsdrug dosagesintensive care medicinesedation

Identifiers

PMID38863729
PMCPMC11165249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.