ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Clinicopathological characteristics and fertility preserving treatment of atypical polypoid adenomyoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fertility-sparing management of atypical polypoid adenomyoma in a premenopausal woman: a two-case report and literature review.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Fertility-sparing treatment for atypical polypoid adenomyoma.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2025Article
- Clinicopathological Characteristics of Atypical Polypoid Adenomyoma of the Uterus in Association With Endometrial Atypical Hyperplasia and Endometrioid Carcinoma.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Atypical polypoid adenomyoma (APA) is a rare benign tumor frequently diagnosed in young women that may coexist with or progress to atypical endometrial hyperplasia (EAH) or endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC). This study aimed to investigate which subset of patients with APA are prone to concurrent or subsequent EAH or EEC, evaluate the necessity of progestin treatment in patients with APA only after achieving a complete response (CR) through hysteroscopic lesion resection, and assess the impact of concurrent APA on the fertility-preserving treatment of EAH or EEC. Methods: This retrospective single-center study analyzed 86 patients with APA treated at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University between January 2010 and October 2021. Patients with EAH or EEC only who underwent fertility-preserving treatment during the same period were matched in a 2:1 ratio with patients with concurrent APA and EAH or EEC. The clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and prognosis were analyzed. Results: The median patient age was 31 years (range 21-47 years). Among the 86 included patients, nine underwent total hysterectomy, 62 received conservative treatment, and the remaining 15 were lost to follow-up. A comparison of the 16 patients with APA only versus the 58 patients with APA and concurrent or subsequent EAH or EEC revealed that a homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) of > 2.2 (P = 0.047) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) concentration of < 1.2 mmol/L (P = 0.028) were independent risk factors for EAH or EEC in patients with APA. Among the 17 patients with APA only who received conservative treatment and achieved a CR after hysteroscopic lesion resection, 13 received hormone treatment for a median duration of 6.3 months. The median follow-up time for these 17 patients was 49.0 months, during which no recurrence of APA was observed, but six patients developed endometrial hyperplastic diseases. Regarding the impact of concurrent APA on fertility-preserving treatment for EAH or EEC, the median time to achieve a CR was 24.0 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.0-40.4) in the APA group and 26.0 weeks (95% CI: 24.3-32.3) in the non-APA group (P = 0.424). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the outcomes of fertility-preserving treatment. Conclusion: Patients with APA only may still develop endometrial hyperplastic diseases after complete resection of the lesion under hysteroscopy to achieve a CR, particularly those with a HOMA-IR of > 2.2 or HDL concentration of < 1.2 mmol/L. Concurrent APA did not affect the efficacy of fertility-preserving treatment in patients with EAH or EEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.