Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38863560›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024

Evaluation of screening algorithms to detect rectal colonization with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in a resource-limited setting.

Thi Anh Mai Pham, Tung Xuan Nguyen, Troung Nhat My, Lan Thi Le, Huyen Thi Vu, Ngoc Thi Bich Hoang, Dien M Tran, Linh Viet Nguyen, Phuc D Pham, Dennis Nurjadi and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Thi Anh Mai PhamDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7963-8864
Tung Xuan NguyenDepartment of Microbiology, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Troung Nhat MyVietnamese German Center for Medical Research (VG-CARE), Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-7897
Lan Thi LeDepartment of Microbiology, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Huyen Thi VuDepartment of Microbiology, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Ngoc Thi Bich HoangDepartment of Microbiology, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9594-6754
Dien M TranDirector Board, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Linh Viet NguyenHanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3152-4830
Phuc D PhamHanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2527-7570
Dennis NurjadiVietnamese German Center for Medical Research (VG-CARE), Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1278-5939
Flavie GoutardThe French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8618-4132
Thirumalaisamy P VelavanInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9809-9883
Van Anh Thi DinhTraining and Research Institute for Child Health, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Y M Gildas HounmanouDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3991-0864
Bent JörgensenTraining and Research Academic Collaboration (TRAC), Sweden, Vietnam.
Le Huu SongVietnamese German Center for Medical Research (VG-CARE), Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1009-3573
Nhung T T NguyenHanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Etienne LoireThe French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3465-7727
Åse ÖstholmDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (BKV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5035-2915
Lennart E NilssonDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (BKV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4104-4195
Tuyet Hanh T TranHanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9191-577X
Phuc H PhanDirector Board, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-446X
Anders DalsgaardDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1765-8055
Mattias LarssonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0514-7445
Linus OlsonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0046-6348
Håkan HanbergerTraining and Research Academic Collaboration (TRAC), Sweden, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4199-0229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To improve and rationalize the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) in rectal swabs in a high-prevalence and resource-constrained setting, addressing surveillance challenges typically encountered in laboratories with limited resources. Methods: A point prevalence survey (PPS) was conducted on 15 August 2022, in a provincial children's hospital in northern Vietnam. Rectal swab samples of all admitted children were collected and plated on a selective medium for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). Species identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) were performed by MALDI-TOF, and VITEK2 XL and interpreted according to CLSI breakpoints (2022). Carbapenemases were detected by the carbapenem inactivation method (CIM) and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Results: Rectal swab samples were obtained from 376 patients. Of 178 isolates growing on the CRE screening agar, 140 isolates were confirmed as Enterobacterales of which 118 (84.3%) isolates were resistant to meropenem and/or ertapenem. CIM and PCR showed that 90/118 (76.3%) were carbapenemase producers. Overall, 83/367 (22.6%) were colonized by CPE. Conclusions: These findings underscore the effectiveness of meropenem resistance as a robust indicator of the production of carbapenemases and the reliability of the CIM method to detect such carbapenemases in resource-limited settings where the performance of molecular methods is not possible.

Identifiers

PMID38863560
PMCPMC11166082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.