ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024
Improved selection of canonical proteins for reference proteomes.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Draft genome sequence of soil isolateMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026Article
- Reconstructing Evolutionary Histories with Hierarchical Orthologous Groups.Journal of molecular evolution · 2025Review
- Quest for Orthologs in the Era of Biodiversity Genomics.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The 'canonical' protein sets distributed by UniProt are widely used for similarity searching, and functional and structural annotation. For many investigators, canonical sequences are the only version of a protein examined. However, higher eukaryotes often encode multiple isoforms of a protein from a single gene. For unreviewed (UniProtKB/TrEMBL) protein sequences, the longest sequence in a Gene-Centric group is chosen as canonical. This choice can create inconsistencies, selecting >95% identical orthologs with dramatically different lengths, which is biologically unlikely. We describe the ortho2tree pipeline, which examines Reference Proteome canonical and isoform sequences from sets of orthologous proteins, builds multiple alignments, constructs gap-distance trees, and identifies low-cost clades of isoforms with similar lengths. After examining 140 000 proteins from eight mammals in UniProtKB release 2022_05, ortho2tree proposed 7804 canonical changes for release 2023_01, while confirming 53 434 canonicals. Gap distributions for isoforms selected by ortho2tree are similar to those in bacterial and yeast alignments, organisms unaffected by isoform selection, suggesting ortho2tree canonicals more accurately reflect genuine biological variation. 82% of ortho2tree proposed-changes agreed with MANE; for confirmed canonicals, 92% agreed with MANE. Ortho2tree can improve canonical assignment among orthologous sequences that are >60% identical, a group that includes vertebrates and higher plants.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.