Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38863374›Full record

ArticleThe world journal of men's health2025

Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Urine Metabolomics via Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry.

Chung-Hsin Chen, Hsiang-Po Huang, Kai-Hsiung Chang, Ming-Shyue Lee, Cheng-Fan Lee, Chih-Yu Lin, Yuan Chi Lin, William J Huang, Chun-Hou Liao, Chih-Chin Yu and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The world journal of men's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Chung-Hsin Chen *Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4921-5315
Hsiang-Po Huang *Graduate Institute of Medical Genomics and Proteomics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3382-305X
Kai-Hsiung ChangInstitute of Cellular and System Medicine, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8392-8319
Ming-Shyue LeeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8673-5088
Cheng-Fan LeeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5043-2560
Chih-Yu LinAgricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3601-9032
Yuan Chi LinDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7049-1728
William J HuangDepartment of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9048-4990
Chun-Hou LiaoDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7340-110X
Chih-Chin YuDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital and The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, College of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1344-1505
Shiu-Dong ChungDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1817-6106
Yao-Chou TsaiDivision of Urology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2833-5609
Chia-Chang WuDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7476-0772
Chen-Hsun HoSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8706-7464
Pei-Wen HsiaoAgricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. pwhsiao@gate.sinica.edu.tw.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3589-6754
Yeong-Shiau PuDepartment of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan. yspu@ntu.edu.tw.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2859-3966
Decipher
BUST Groups

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare, Executive Yuan, Taiwan MOHW111-TDUB-221-114002Ministry of Health and Welfare, Executive Yuan, Taiwan MOHW112-TDU-B-222-124002Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Yuan, Taiwan MOST 107-2314-B-002-032-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Yuan, Taiwan MOST 107-2321-B-002-065Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Yuan, Taiwan MOST 108-2321-B-002-029Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Yuan, Taiwan MOST 109-2327-B-002-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBiomarkers predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (sPC) before biopsy are currently lacking. This study aimed to develop a non-invasive urine test to predict sPC in at-risk men using urinary metabolomic profiles. MATERIALS AND

methodsUrine samples from 934 at-risk subjects and 268 treatment-naïve PC patients were subjected to liquid chromatography/mass spectrophotometry (LC-MS)-based metabolomics profiling using both C18 and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) column analyses. Four models were constructed (training cohort [n=647]) and validated (validation cohort [n=344]) for different purposes. Model I differentiates PC from benign cases. Models II, III, and a Gleason score model (model GS) predict sPC that is defined as National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-categorized favorable-intermediate risk group or higher (Model II), unfavorable-intermediate risk group or higher (Model III), and GS ≥7 PC (model GS), respectively. The metabolomic panels and predicting models were constructed using logistic regression and Akaike information criterion.

resultsThe best metabolomic panels from the HILIC column include 25, 27, 28 and 26 metabolites in Models I, II, III, and GS, respectively, with area under the curve (AUC) values ranging between 0.82 and 0.91 in the training cohort and between 0.77 and 0.86 in the validation cohort. The combination of the metabolomic panels and five baseline clinical factors that include serum prostate-specific antigen, age, family history of PC, previously negative biopsy, and abnormal digital rectal examination results significantly increased AUCs (range 0.88-0.91). At 90% sensitivity (validation cohort), 33%, 34%, 41%, and 36% of unnecessary biopsies were avoided in Models I, II, III, and GS, respectively. The above results were successfully validated using LC-MS with the C18 column.

conclusionsUrinary metabolomic profiles with baseline clinical factors may accurately predict sPC in men with elevated risk before biopsy.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBiopsyMetabolomicsProstatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID38863374
PMCPMC11937347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.