Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38863325›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2024

Engineered Graphene Material Improves the Performance of Intraneural Peripheral Nerve Electrodes.

Bruno Rodríguez-Meana, Jaume Del Valle, Damià Viana, Steven T Walston, Nicola Ria, Eduard Masvidal-Codina, Jose A Garrido, Xavier Navarro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bruno Rodríguez-MeanaInstitute of Neurosciences, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0052-7446
Jaume Del ValleInstitute of Neurosciences, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.
Damià VianaCatalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), CSIC and BIST, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.
Steven T WalstonCatalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), CSIC and BIST, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.
Nicola RiaCatalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), CSIC and BIST, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.
Eduard Masvidal-CodinaCatalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), CSIC and BIST, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.
Jose A GarridoCatalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), CSIC and BIST, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.
Xavier NavarroInstitute of Neurosciences, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9849-902X

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación CEX2021-001214-SAgencia Estatal de Investigación PCI2018-093029Agencia Estatal de Investigación PCI2021-1220752AAgencia Estatal de Investigación PCI2021-122095-2AInstituto de Salud Carlos III CB06/05/1105Instituto de Salud Carlos III RD21/0017/0008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limb neuroprostheses aim to restore motor and sensory functions in amputated or severely nerve-injured patients. These devices use neural interfaces to record and stimulate nerve action potentials, creating a bidirectional connection with the nervous system. Most neural interfaces are based on standard metal microelectrodes. In this work, a new generation of neural interfaces which replaces metals with engineered graphene, called EGNITE, is tested. In vitro and in vivo experiments are conducted to assess EGNITE biocompatibility. In vitro tests show that EGNITE does not impact cell viability. In vivo, no significant functional decrease or harmful effects are observed. Furthermore, the foreign body reaction to the intraneural implant is similar compared to other materials previously used in neural interfaces. Regarding functionality, EGNITE devices are able to stimulate nerve fascicles, during two months of implant, producing selective muscle activation with about three times less current compared to larger microelectrodes of standard materials. CNAP elicited by electrical stimuli and ENG evoked by mechanical stimuli are recorded with high resolution but are more affected by decreased functionality over time. This work constitutes further proof that graphene-derived materials, and specifically EGNITE, is a promising conductive material of neural electrodes for advanced neuroprostheses.

Indexed as

GraphitePeripheral NervesAction PotentialsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsElectrodes, ImplantedMaleMicroelectrodesRatsBiocompatible MaterialsGraphiteforeign body reactiongrapheneintraneural electrodeneuroprosthesesrecordingstimulation

Identifiers

PMID38863325
PMCPMC11304253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.