ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2024
Engineered Graphene Material Improves the Performance of Intraneural Peripheral Nerve Electrodes.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Ultrasonic Treatment of Dispersed Carbon Nanocomposite Media on the Formation, Electrical Conductivity, and Degradation of a Hydrogel for Metallic Stimulation Electrodes.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Long-Term Stable Neural Interfaces with Nanoporous Graphene Electrodes and Hybrid Polyimide-Aluminium Oxide Encapsulation.Small methods · 2025Article
- Covalent Binding of Dexamethasone to Polyimide Improves Biocompatibility of Neural Implantable Devices.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Flexible graphene-based neurotechnology for high-precision deep brain mapping and neuromodulation in Parkinsonian rats.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Carbon Nanomaterials in Biomedicine: Opportunities and Toxicological Concerns.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Engineered Graphene Material Improves the Performance of Intraneural Peripheral Nerve Electrodes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Limb neuroprostheses aim to restore motor and sensory functions in amputated or severely nerve-injured patients. These devices use neural interfaces to record and stimulate nerve action potentials, creating a bidirectional connection with the nervous system. Most neural interfaces are based on standard metal microelectrodes. In this work, a new generation of neural interfaces which replaces metals with engineered graphene, called EGNITE, is tested. In vitro and in vivo experiments are conducted to assess EGNITE biocompatibility. In vitro tests show that EGNITE does not impact cell viability. In vivo, no significant functional decrease or harmful effects are observed. Furthermore, the foreign body reaction to the intraneural implant is similar compared to other materials previously used in neural interfaces. Regarding functionality, EGNITE devices are able to stimulate nerve fascicles, during two months of implant, producing selective muscle activation with about three times less current compared to larger microelectrodes of standard materials. CNAP elicited by electrical stimuli and ENG evoked by mechanical stimuli are recorded with high resolution but are more affected by decreased functionality over time. This work constitutes further proof that graphene-derived materials, and specifically EGNITE, is a promising conductive material of neural electrodes for advanced neuroprostheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.