ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2024
Effects of pioglitazone and metformin on abdominal adhesion formation in an experimental model.
Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluated the use of metformin or pioglitazone in preventing or reducing the development of post-operative intra-abdominal adhesion (PIAA) by employing histopathological, immunohistochemical, and biochemical analyses in an experimental adhesion model.
methodsFifty Wistar-Albino rats were divided into five groups: Group I (Control), Group II (Sham Treatment), Group III (Hy-aluronic Acid), Group IV (Metformin), and Group V (Pioglitazone). Adhesions were induced in the experimental groups, except for the sham group, using the scraping method. After 10 days, rats were euthanized for evaluation. Macroscopic adhesion degrees were assessed using Nair's scoring system. Immunohistochemical and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods were utilized to assess serum, peritoneal lavage, and intestinal tissue samples. Fructosamine, interleukin-6 (IL-6), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), and fibronectin levels were measured in serum and peritoneal lavage samples.
resultsThe groups exhibited similar Nair scores and Type I or Type III Collagen staining scores (all, p>0.05). Pioglitazone significantly reduced serum IL-6 and TGF-β levels compared to controls (p=0.002 and p=0.008, respectively). Both metformin and pioglitazone groups showed elevated IL-6 in peritoneal lavage relative to controls, while fibronectin levels in the lavage were lower in pioglitazone-treated rats compared to the sham group (all, p<0.005).
conclusionPioglitazone, but not metformin, demonstrated a positive biochemical impact on preventing PIAA formation in an experimental rat model, although histological impacts were not observed. Further experimental studies employing different dose/duration regimens of pioglitazone are needed to enhance our understanding of its effect on PIAA formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.