Trial reportUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2024
Pain monitoring in intensive care: How does the nociception level index affect treatment and prognosis? A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial.
Trial report in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nociception and pain assessment during suctioning procedures in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit: A validation study of the Nociception Level index (NOL™).Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of ICU nurses regarding daily sedation interruption: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective pain management is vital in critical care settings, particularly post-surgery. Clinicians should maintain objective and efficient standards to assess pain in a patient-centered manner, in order to effectively manage this complex issue. A newer technology, the nociception level (NOL) index, shows promise in achieving this task through its multi-parameter evaluation.
methodsThis study was a prospective, controlled, randomized trial involving two groups of patients (n=30 each) in a diverse intensive care unit. Participants were over 18 years old with American Society of Anesthesiology scores ranging from I to III and were scheduled for critical care follow-up after general anesthesia. All subjects followed a standard analgesia protocol that included rescue analgesia. Drug administration was guided by a numeric rating scale and the critical care pain observation tool in the Control Group, while it was guided by nociception level index monitoring in the NOL Group.
resultsPain scores between the two groups did not significantly differ. However, within the NOL Group, pain scores and noci-ception values displayed a strong positive correlation. Notably, total analgesic consumption was significantly lower in the NOL Group (p=0.036).
conclusionMonitoring pain using the nociception level index is an effective method for detecting pain compared to standard pain scores utilized in critical care. Its guidance facilitates personalized analgesic titration. Additionally, the potential of nociception level index guidance to reduce the duration of intensive care and hospital stays may be linked to its effects on delirium, a connection that awaits further exploration in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.