Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38863288›Full record

ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2024

Evaluation of the effects of ectopic replantation on amputate survival in the management of crush traumatic amputations in rats: An experimental study.

Münür Selçuk Kendir, Bilsev İnce, Majid İsmayılzade, Zikrullah Baycar, Hayri Ahmet Burak Nurşen, Mehmet Dadaci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Münür Selçuk KendirPlastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Clinic, Ankara Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara- Türkiye.
Bilsev İncePrivate Practice, Izmir- Türkiye.
Majid İsmayılzadeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Istinye University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul-Türkiye.
Zikrullah BaycarPlastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Clinic, Konya City Hospital, Konya-Türkiye.
Hayri Ahmet Burak NurşenDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya-Türkiye.
Mehmet DadaciDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya-Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis controlled experimental study aimed to compare ectopic replantation with other replantation techniques in a rat model of crush amputations. It also assessed the impact of different replantation methods on the viability of amputates.

methodsForty male Wistar albino rats were divided into four groups. Groin flaps served as the amputation model. Group 1 un-derwent guillotine-style amputation followed by orthotopic replantation, Group 2 experienced crush-type amputation and orthotopic replantation, Group 3 had crush-type amputation and orthotopic replantation with a vein graft, and Group 4 underwent crush-type amputation followed by ectopic replantation. Flap viability and perfusion rates were assessed on day 3 using an infrared perfusion as-sessment system. The ratio of viable area to total flap area and thrombus formation in the pedicle vessels were evaluated on day 7.

resultsInfrared evaluations on day 3 post-replantation revealed flap perfusion percentages of 73.5% in Group 1, 11.1% in Group 2, 65% in Group 3, and 64.1% in Group 4. Statistical analysis indicated that Group 1 exhibited the highest perfusion rates, while Group 2 showed the lowest. No differences were observed between Groups 3 and 4. On the seventh day, the average surviving flap areas were found to be 74.6% in Group 1, 2.5% in Group 2, 64.5% in Group 3, and 64% in Group 4. Statistically, Group 1 exhibited the best outcomes, while Group 2 had the poorest, with no differences between Groups 3 and 4. Additionally, thrombus formation was observed in the vessels of two animals in Group 1, nine in Group 2, and three each in Groups 3 and 4. Significant statistical differences were noted among the groups.

conclusionThe results indicate that ectopic replantation and replantation with a vein graft are equally effective. The preferred method for crush-type replantations may depend on the patient's and the amputated limb's conditions. In crush-type amputations, we recommend vein graft repair if the patient's overall condition supports replantation and if crushed segments can be debrided without excessive shortening of the amputated part. If these conditions are not met, temporary ectopic replantation is advised to preserve the amputated limb.

Indexed as

Amputation, TraumaticCrush InjuriesRats, WistarReplantationAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMaleRatsSurgical Flaps

Identifiers

PMID38863288
PMCPMC11230047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.