Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38863033›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2024

Co-evolution of vaginal microbiome and cervical cancer.

Menglu Hu, Wentao Yang, Ruiyi Yan, Jiayu Chi, Qi Xia, Yilin Yang, Yinhan Wang, Lejia Sun, Ping Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Menglu Hu *School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Wentao Yang *School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Ruiyi Yan *Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Jiayu ChiSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Qi XiaSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Yilin YangSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Yinhan WangChinese Academy of Medical Sciences Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. wyh_pumc17@163.com.
Lejia SunChinese Academy of Medical Sciences Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. sunlejia361@163.com.
Ping LiDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, China. Pingli8702@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8946-9945

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant No.2023T160328, Grant No.2023M731765Major Basic Research Project of the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions Grant No.23KJB320002Suzhou science and technology plan project SKY2023093,KJXW2019064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExploration of adaptive evolutionary changes at the genetic level in vaginal microbial communities during different stages of cervical cancer remains limited. This study aimed to elucidate the mutational profile of the vaginal microbiota throughout the progression of cervical disease and subsequently establish diagnostic models.

methodsThis study utilized a metagenomic dataset consisting of 151 subjects classified into four categories: invasive cervical cancer (CC) (n = 42), cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) (n = 43), HPV-infected (HPVi) patients without cervical lesions (n = 34), and healthy controls (n = 32). The analysis focused on changes in microbiome abundance and extracted information on genetic variation. Consequently, comprehensive multimodal microbial signatures associated with CC, encompassing taxonomic alterations, mutation signatures, and enriched metabolic functional pathways, were identified. Diagnostic models for predicting CC were established considering gene characteristics based on single nucleotide variants (SNVs).

resultsIn this study, we screened and analyzed the abundances of 18 key microbial strains during CC progression. Additionally, 71,6358 non-redundant mutations were identified, predominantly consisting of SNVs that were further annotated into 25,773 genes. Altered abundances of SNVs and mutation types were observed across the four groups. Specifically, there were 9847 SNVs in the HPV-infected group and 14,892 in the CC group. Furthermore, two distinct mutation signatures corresponding to the benign and malignant groups were identified. The enriched metabolic pathways showed limited similarity with only two overlapping pathways among the four groups. HPVi patients exhibited active nucleotide biosynthesis, whereas patients with CC demonstrated a significantly higher abundance of signaling and cellular-associated protein families. In contrast, healthy controls showed a distinct enrichment in sugar metabolism. Moreover, biomarkers based on microbial SNV abundance displayed stronger diagnostic capability (cc.AUC = 0.87) than the species-level biomarkers (cc.AUC = 0.78). Ultimately, the integration of multimodal biomarkers demonstrated optimal performance for accurately identifying different cervical statuses (cc.AUC = 0.86), with an acceptable performance (AUC = 0.79) in the external testing set.

conclusionsThe vaginal microbiome exhibits specific SNV evolution in conjunction with the progression of CC, and serves as a specific biomarker for distinguishing between different statuses of cervical disease.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginaAdultCase-Control StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideCervical cancerCo-evolutionSingle nucleotide variationVaginal microbiome

Identifiers

PMID38863033
PMCPMC11167889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.