Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38863018›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

The effect of an improved ICU physical environment on outcomes and post-ICU recovery-a protocol.

Oystein Tronstad, Barbara Zangerl, Sue Patterson, Dylan Flaws, Stephanie Yerkovich, Irene Szollosi, Nicole White, Veronica Garcia-Hansen, Francisca Rodriguez Leonard, Benjamin D Weger and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Circadian Neurology.Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Building better ECMO rooms: a roadmap to standardization and innovation.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Oystein TronstadCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Level 3 Clinical Sciences Building, Rode Road, Chermside, Brisbane, Qld, 4032, Australia. oystein.tronstad@health.qld.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7751-3267
Barbara ZangerlCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Level 3 Clinical Sciences Building, Rode Road, Chermside, Brisbane, Qld, 4032, Australia.
Sue PattersonCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Level 3 Clinical Sciences Building, Rode Road, Chermside, Brisbane, Qld, 4032, Australia.
Dylan FlawsCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Level 3 Clinical Sciences Building, Rode Road, Chermside, Brisbane, Qld, 4032, Australia.
Stephanie YerkovichMenzies School of Health Research and Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Irene SzollosiSleep Disorders Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Nicole WhiteCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Level 3 Clinical Sciences Building, Rode Road, Chermside, Brisbane, Qld, 4032, Australia.
Veronica Garcia-HansenSchool of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Francisca Rodriguez LeonardSchool of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Benjamin D WegerInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Frédéric GachonInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
David BrainAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Jayshree LavanaAdult Intensive Care Services, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Carol HodgsonAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
John F FraserCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Level 3 Clinical Sciences Building, Rode Road, Chermside, Brisbane, Qld, 4032, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive care medicine continues to improve, with advances in technology and care provision leading to improved patient survival. However, this has not been matched by similar advances in ICU bedspace design. Environmental factors including excessive noise, suboptimal lighting, and lack of natural lights and views can adversely impact staff wellbeing and short- and long-term patient outcomes. The personal, social, and economic costs associated with this are potentially large. The ICU of the Future project was conceived to address these issues. This is a mixed-method project, aiming to improve the ICU bedspace environment and assess impact on patient outcomes. Two innovative and adaptive ICU bedspaces capable of being individualised to patients' personal and changing needs were co-designed and implemented. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of an improved ICU bedspace environment on patient outcomes and operational impact.

methodsThis is a prospective multi-component, mixed methods study including a randomised controlled trial. Over a 2-year study period, the two upgraded bedspaces will serve as intervention beds, while the remaining 25 bedspaces in the study ICU function as control beds. Study components encompass (1) an objective environmental assessment; (2) a qualitative investigation of the ICU environment and its impact from the perspective of patients, families, and staff; (3) sleep investigations; (4) circadian rhythm investigations; (5) delirium measurements; (6) assessment of medium-term patient outcomes; and (7) a health economic evaluation. DISCUSSION: Despite growing evidence of the negative impact the ICU environment can have on patient recovery, this is an area of critical care medicine that is understudied and commonly not considered when ICUs are being designed. This study will provide new information on how an improved ICU environment impact holistic patient recovery and outcomes, potentially influencing ICU design worldwide.

trial registrationACTRN12623000541606. Registered on May 22, 2023. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=385845&isReview=true .

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBedsCritical CareCritical Care OutcomesHealth Facility EnvironmentHospital Design and ConstructionHumansProspective StudiesTime FactorsCo-designEnvironmentICULightNoiseStudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID38863018
PMCPMC11167845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.