Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38862919›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Evaluation of a culture change program to reduce unprofessional behaviours by hospital co-workers in Australian hospitals.

Johanna I Westbrook, Rachel Urwin, Ryan McMullan, Tim Badgery-Parker, Antoinette Pavithra, Kate Churruca, Neil Cunningham, Erwin Loh, Peter Hibbert, Guy Maddern and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Co-worker unprofessional behaviour and patient safety risks: an analysis of co-worker reports across eight Australian hospitals.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Johanna I WestbrookAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Johanna.westbrook@mq.edu.au.
Rachel UrwinAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ryan McMullanAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Tim Badgery-ParkerAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Antoinette PavithraAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kate ChurrucaAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Neil CunninghamVincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Erwin LohAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Peter HibbertAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Guy MaddernDiscipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jeffrey BraithwaiteAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ling LiAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnprofessional behaviours between healthcare workers are highly prevalent. Evaluations of large-scale culture change programs are rare resulting in limited evidence of intervention effectiveness. We conducted a multi-method evaluation of a professional accountability and culture change program "Ethos" implemented across eight Australian hospitals. The Ethos program incorporates training for staff in speaking-up; an online system for reporting co-worker behaviours; and a tiered accountability pathway, including peer-messengers who deliver feedback to staff for 'reflection' or 'recognition'. Here we report the final evaluation component which aimed to measure changes in the prevalence of unprofessional behaviours before and after Ethos.

methodsA survey of staff (clinical and non-clinical) experiences of 26 unprofessional behaviours across five hospitals at baseline before (2018) and 2.5-3 years after (2021/2022) Ethos implementation. Five of the 26 behaviours were classified as 'extreme' (e.g., assault) and 21 as incivility/bullying (e.g., being spoken to rudely). Our analysis assessed changes in four dimensions: work-related bullying; person-related bullying; physical bullying and sexual harassment. Change in experience of incivility/bullying was compared using multivariable ordinal logistic regression. Change in extreme behaviours was assessed using multivariable binary logistic regression. All models were adjusted for respondent characteristics.

resultsIn total, 3975 surveys were completed. Staff reporting frequent incivility/bullying significantly declined from 41.7% (n = 1064; 95% CI 39.7,43.9) at baseline to 35.5% (n = 505; 95% CI 32.8,38.3; χ

conclusionThe Ethos program was associated with significant reductions in the prevalence of reported unprofessional behaviours and improved capacity of hospital staff to speak-up. These results add to evidence that staff will actively engage with a system that supports informal feedback to co-workers about their behaviours and is facilitated by trained peer messengers.

Indexed as

BullyingOrganizational CultureAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonnel, HospitalProfessional MisconductProgram EvaluationSexual HarassmentSurveys and QuestionnairesBullyingDisruptive behavioursIncivilityProfessionalismSpeaking-upWorkplace mistreatment

Identifiers

PMID38862919
PMCPMC11167838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.