Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38862909›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Factors influencing senior care and living preferences among older adults in Jiangsu, China: a cross-sectional survey study.

Yanan Wang, Yaning Wang, Yitong Liu, Wenkun Xu, Zhuoya Yang, Zhongying Xu, Yaqin Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yanan Wang *School of Public Health, Nantong University, 9 Se-yuan Road, Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, 210029, China.
Yaning Wang *School of Public Health, Nantong University, 9 Se-yuan Road, Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, 210029, China.
Yitong LiuSchool of Public Health, Nantong University, 9 Se-yuan Road, Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, 210029, China.
Wenkun XuSchool of Public Health, Nantong University, 9 Se-yuan Road, Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, 210029, China.
Zhuoya YangSchool of Public Health, Nantong University, 9 Se-yuan Road, Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, 210029, China.
Zhongying XuSchool of Medicine, Nantong University, 19 Qi-xiu Road, Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, 226001, China.
Yaqin ZhongSchool of Public Health, Nantong University, 9 Se-yuan Road, Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, 210029, China. yqzhong@ntu.edu.cn.

Funding

Funding of Nantong Science and Technology Program MS2023084Humanities and Social Science Foundation of the Ministry of Education in China 21YJA840018National Social Science Fund of China 23BSH151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the population ages, senior care for older adults in China has become increasingly important and has attracted the attention of both government and society. This study aimed to explore preferences and influencing factors related to senior care among older Chinese adults and thus propose effective and targeted strategies for the development of a comprehensive care system for older adults in the aging Chinese population.

methodsData were obtained from a cross-sectional survey conducted in sixteen communities or villages in Jiangsu Province, China, from July to September 2021. Guided by the Andersen Behavioral Model, multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify factors associated with preferences for senior care arrangements.

resultsA total of 870 respondents were included in the study, 60.11% of whom preferred receiving care in their own homes, while only 13.68% chose residential care facilities (RCFs). For predisposing factors, rural respondents preferred receiving care in their own homes compared to urban respondents (children's home: OR = 0.55, P < 0.01; RCF: OR = 0.58, P < 0.01). Concerning enabling factors, respondents who were not employed (OR = 2.30, P < 0.01) and those without financial support (OR = 2.73, P < 0.05) preferred RCFs to their own homes. Respondents receiving life assistance (sometimes: OR = 2.76, P < 0.001; regularly: OR = 2.57, P < 0.01; every day: OR = 3.57, P < 0.001) preferred their children's homes to their own homes. In terms of need factors, respondents with noncommunicable diseases (NCDs, OR > 1, P < 0.05), those who knew about RCFs (some: OR = 0.53, P < 0.005; no: OR = 0.10, P < 0.001) and those with a good impression of RCFs (fair: OR = 3.72, P < 0.05; good: OR = 11.91, P < 0.001) preferred receiving care in RCFs compared to their counterparts.

conclusionsOlder Chinese adults' senior care preferences were affected by predisposing factors, enabling factors, and need factors. Policy-makers should consider targeted measures to identify more precise senior care services and thus address aging challenges in China.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAgedAged, 80 and overChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesAndersen behavioral modelChinaOlder adultsPreferenceSenior care

Identifiers

PMID38862909
PMCPMC11167893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.