Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Najmeh MoradiHealth Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8500-1931
Nicole O'ConnorNational Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory and Evidence Synthesis Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5TG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6654-7178
Katie H ThomsonNational Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory and Evidence Synthesis Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5TG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9614-728X
Hosein ShabaninejadHealth Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9512-1398
Tumi SotireHealth Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5330-9568
Madeleine StillNational Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory and Evidence Synthesis Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5TG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0625-6325
Cristina Fernandez-GarciaHealth Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7113-225X
Sheila A WallaceNational Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory and Evidence Synthesis Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5TG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2853-3653
Oleta WilliamsNational Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory and Evidence Synthesis Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5TG, UK.ORCID 0009-0000-2126-7546
Luke ValeHealth Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8574-8429
Gurdeep S SagooHealth Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4BN, UK. Gurdeep.Sagoo@Newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1427-1437
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
NICE Approaches to Expert Opinion Evidence in Highly Specialised Technologies: Time to Change? Evidence Assessment Group Perspective. · full record | OpenQuestion