ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024
Deep Learning Model for Automatic Identification and Classification of Distal Radius Fracture.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in virtual fracture clinics: a systematic review of imaging and clinical-text tools.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common types of wrist fractures. We aimed to construct a model for the automatic segmentation of wrist radiographs using a deep learning approach and further perform automatic identification and classification of DRF. A total of 2240 participants with anteroposterior wrist radiographs from one hospital between January 2015 and October 2021 were included. The outcomes were automatic segmentation of wrist radiographs, identification of DRF, and classification of DRF (type A, type B, type C). The Unet model and Fast-RCNN model were used for automatic segmentation. The DenseNet121 model and ResNet50 model were applied to DRF identification of DRF. The DenseNet121 model, ResNet50 model, VGG-19 model, and InceptionV3 model were used for DRF classification. The area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval (CI), accuracy, precision, and F1-score was utilized to assess the effectiveness of the identification and classification models. Of these 2240 participants, 1440 (64.3%) had DRF, of which 701 (48.7%) were type A, 278 (19.3%) were type B, and 461 (32.0%) were type C. Both the Unet model and the Fast-RCNN model showed good segmentation of wrist radiographs. For DRF identification, the AUCs of the DenseNet121 model and the ResNet50 model in the testing set were 0.941 (95%CI: 0.926-0.965) and 0.936 (95%CI: 0.913-0.955), respectively. The AUCs of the DenseNet121 model (testing set) for classification type A, type B, and type C were 0.96, 0.96, and 0.96, respectively. The DenseNet121 model may provide clinicians with a tool for interpreting wrist radiographs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.