Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38862845›Full record

ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

50 Years of Research on the Psychology of Sport Injury: A Consensus Statement.

Ulrika Tranaeus, Adam Gledhill, Urban Johnson, Leslie Podlog, Ross Wadey, Diane Wiese Bjornstal, Andreas Ivarsson

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ulrika TranaeusStockholm Sports Trauma Research Centre, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, Box 5626, 114 86, Stockholm, Sweden. Ulrika.tranaeus@gih.se.ORCID 0000-0002-2102-6352
Adam GledhillCarnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2263-6248
Urban JohnsonSchool of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0990-4842
Leslie PodlogSchool of Kinesiology and Physical Activity Sciences, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5012-9118
Ross WadeySt Mary's University, Twickenham, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7269-6754
Diane Wiese BjornstalSchool of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4824-3311
Andreas IvarssonSchool of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8987-5975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Factors influencing sport injury risk, rehabilitation outcomes, and return to sport processes have been the focus in various research disciplines (sports medicine, psychology and sociology). One discipline, with over 50 years of scholarship, is the psychology of sport injury. Despite the research in this field, there is no evidence-based consensus to inform professional practice. The aim of this original and timely consensus statement is to summarise psychological sport injury research and provide consensus recommendations for sport practitioners seeking to implement psychological principles into clinical practice. A total of seven experts with extensive experience outlined the consensus objectives and identified three psychology of sport injury sub-domains: risk, rehabilitation and return to sport. The researchers, grouped in pairs, prepared initial drafts of assigned sub-domains. The group met in Stockholm, and the three texts were merged into a draft and revised in an iterative process. Stress responses are the strongest psychological risk factor for acute injuries. Intra- and interpersonal factors, as well as sociocultural factors, are demonstrated psychosocial risk factors for overuse injuries. Stress management and mindfulness interventions to prevent injuries have been successfully implemented. The rehabilitation process may influence athlete's cognitive, emotional, and behavioural responses. Social support, mindfulness, acceptance-based practices, and cognitive-behavioural based intervention programs reduce negative reactions. Return to sport includes various stages and different trajectories. Returning athletes typically experience concerns regarding competence, autonomy, and relatedness. It is recommended that athletes focus on the physical, technical, and psychological demands of their sport as they progress to increasingly intense activities. Interdisciplinary collaboration (e.g., sports medicine and psychology) would be beneficial in enhancing clinical practice and improving athlete outcomes.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesReturn to SportConsensusCumulative Trauma DisordersHumansMindfulnessRisk FactorsSocial SupportStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID38862845
PMCPMC11258162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.