Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38862785›Full record

ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Modern thyroid surgery : Efficient and safe thyroidectomy technique].

Constantin Aurel Smaxwil, Andreas Zielke

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Constantin Aurel SmaxwilEndokrine Chirurgie, Diakonie-Klinikum Stuttgart, Rosenbergstraße 38, 70176, Stuttgart, Deutschland.
Andreas ZielkeEndokrine Chirurgie, Diakonie-Klinikum Stuttgart, Rosenbergstraße 38, 70176, Stuttgart, Deutschland. andreas.zielke@diak-stuttgart.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After decades of bilateral "subtotal" and later "total" thyroidectomy, the extent of resection is now determined individually depending on the dominant thyroid condition. The leading indication by far in the study, documentation and quality center (StuDoQ) register of the Surgical Working Group Endocrinology (CAEK) is currently the suspicion of malignancy, which is followed by benign symptomatic nodular goiter, functional disorders and confirmed malignancy. The decision for an intervention as well as the extent of resection must be rigorously established. Aids for intraoperative nerve monitoring, vessel-sealing and parathyroid autofluorescence increase the safety of thyroid resections but also the complexity. The surgical technique of lobectomy using modern devices for vessel sealing is an intricate process in which the positioning, access to the neck and a modified sequence of dissection steps are equally important. While the usefulness of neuromonitoring is nowadays no longer in doubt, this is not yet so clear for other technologies. Above all, however, modern thyroid surgery is characterized by the knowledge of one's own results and a clear positioning to follow-ups. The selection of any surgical aid should be based on this knowledge.

Indexed as

ThyroidectomyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsThyroid DiseasesThyroid NeoplasmsComplicationICG fluorescence angiographyNeuromonitoringQualityVessel sealing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.