SynthesisNeuroradiology2024
Machine learning for predicting hematoma expansion in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The performance of artificial intelligence in image-based prediction of hematoma enlargement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Application of Deep Learning for Predicting Hematoma Expansion in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Using Computed Tomography Scans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.La Radiologia medica · 2025Pooled it
- Early Predictive Accuracy of Machine Learning for Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Prediction models for early neurological deterioration in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and critical appraisal.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Review
- Comparing manual and automated methods for extracting perihematomal features in predicting hemorrhage expansion in deep intracerebral hemorrhage.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predicting time-to-event outcomes in critically ill patients with intracerebral hemorrhage using machine learning.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- An interpretable multimodal model for early prediction of delayed hematoma progression in frontal lobe contusion: a machine learning approach.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Enhancing hematoma expansion prediction in hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage based on habitat and perihematomal edema radiomics from non-contrast CT: a dual-center study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- A decision tree model for hematoma expansion prediction in women after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Predicting hematoma growth in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A simplified non-contrast computed tomography based five-point grading approach.World journal of radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEarly identification of hematoma enlargement and persistent hematoma expansion (HE) in patients with cerebral hemorrhage is increasingly crucial for determining clinical treatments. However, due to the lack of clinically effective tools, radiomics has been gradually introduced into the early identification of hematoma enlargement. Though, radiomics has limited predictive accuracy due to variations in procedures. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the value of radiomics in the early detection of HE in patients with cerebral hemorrhage.
methodsEligible studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science from inception to April 8, 2024. English articles are considered eligible. The radiomics quality scoring (RQS) tool was used to evaluate included studies.
resultsA total of 34 studies were identified with sample sizes ranging from 108 to 3016. Eleven types of models were involved, and the types of modeling contained mainly clinical, radiomic, and radiomic plus clinical features. The radiomics models seem to have better performance (0.77 and 0.73 C-index in the training cohort and validation cohort, respectively) than the clinical models (0.69 C-index in the training cohort and 0.70 C-index in the validation cohort) in discriminating HE. However, the C-index was the highest for the combined model in both the training (0.82) and validation (0.79) cohorts.
conclusionsMachine learning based on radiomic plus clinical features has the best predictive performance for HE, followed by machine learning based on radiomic features, and can be used as a potential tool to assist clinicians in early judgment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38862772What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.