Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38862745›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024

Audio-based event detection in the operating room.

Jonas Fuchtmann, Thomas Riedel, Maximilian Berlet, Alissa Jell, Luca Wegener, Lars Wagner, Simone Graf, Dirk Wilhelm, Daniel Ostler-Mildner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sound source localization for spatial mapping of surgical actions in dynamic scenes.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Noise levels in tele-operated robotic-assisted surgery-a phase-based analysis.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. ReflectOR: an LLM-based Agent for Post-Operative Surgical Debriefing.... International Workshop on Spoken Dialogue Systems Technology. International Workshop on Spoken Dialogue Systems Technology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jonas FuchtmannResearch Group MITI, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. jonas.fuchtmann@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0257-1571
Thomas RiedelResearch Group MITI, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Maximilian BerletResearch Group MITI, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alissa JellResearch Group MITI, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Luca WegenerResearch Group MITI, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lars WagnerResearch Group MITI, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Simone GrafUniversity Hospital of Hearing, Speech and Voice Disorders, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Dirk WilhelmResearch Group MITI, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Daniel Ostler-MildnerResearch Group MITI, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEven though workflow analysis in the operating room has come a long way, current systems are still limited to research. In the quest for a robust, universal setup, hardly any attention has been given to the dimension of audio despite its numerous advantages, such as low costs, location, and sight independence, or little required processing power. METHODOLOGY: We present an approach for audio-based event detection that solely relies on two microphones capturing the sound in the operating room. Therefore, a new data set was created with over 63 h of audio recorded and annotated at the University Hospital rechts der Isar. Sound files were labeled, preprocessed, augmented, and subsequently converted to log-mel-spectrograms that served as a visual input for an event classification using pretrained convolutional neural networks.

resultsComparing multiple architectures, we were able to show that even lightweight models, such as MobileNet, can already provide promising results. Data augmentation additionally improved the classification of 11 defined classes, including inter alia different types of coagulation, operating table movements as well as an idle class. With the newly created audio data set, an overall accuracy of 90%, a precision of 91% and a F1-score of 91% were achieved, demonstrating the feasibility of an audio-based event recognition in the operating room.

conclusionWith this first proof of concept, we demonstrated that audio events can serve as a meaningful source of information that goes beyond spoken language and can easily be integrated into future workflow recognition pipelines using computational inexpensive architectures.

Indexed as

Operating RoomsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerWorkflowAudio signal classificationEvent detectionSurgical sound analysisWorkflow analysis

Identifiers

PMID38862745
PMCPMC11607025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.