Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38862686›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Deep learning with mixup augmentation for improved pore detection during additive manufacturing.

Bulbul Ahmmed, Elisabeth G Rau, Maruti K Mudunuru, Satish Karra, Joshua R Tempelman, Adam J Wachtor, Jean-Baptiste Forien, Gabe M Guss, Nicholas P Calta, Phillip J DePond and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bulbul AhmmedEarth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Elisabeth G RauMatador Resources Company, Dallas, TX, 75240, USA.
Maruti K MudunuruSubsurface Science Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA. maruti@pnnl.gov.
Satish KarraEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA.
Joshua R TempelmanEngineering Institute, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Adam J WachtorEngineering Institute, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Jean-Baptiste ForienPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA.
Gabe M GussEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA.
Nicholas P CaltaPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA.
Phillip J DePondPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA.
Manyalibo J MatthewsPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA.

Funding

EMSL, PNNL DE-AC05-76RL01830LANL LDRD 20200669DILLNL DE-AC52-07NA27344NSF DGE-1746047Office of Science DE-AC02-05CH11231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In additive manufacturing (AM), process defects such as keyhole pores are difficult to anticipate, affecting the quality and integrity of the AM-produced materials. Hence, considerable efforts have aimed to predict these process defects by training machine learning (ML) models using passive measurements such as acoustic emissions. This work considered a dataset in which keyhole pores of a laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) experiment were identified using X-ray radiography and then registered both in space and time to acoustic measurements recorded during the LPBF experiment. Due to AM's intrinsic process controls, where a pore-forming event is relatively rare, the acoustic datasets collected during monitoring include more non-pores than pores. In other words, the dataset for ML model development is imbalanced. Moreover, this imbalanced and sparse data phenomenon remains ubiquitous across many AM monitoring schemes since training data is nontrivial to collect. Hence, we propose a machine learning approach to improve this dataset imbalance and enhance the prediction accuracy of pore-labeled data. Specifically, we investigate how data augmentation helps predict pores and non-pores better. This imbalance is improved using recent advances in data augmentation called Mixup, a weak-supervised learning method. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are trained on original and augmented datasets, and an appreciable increase in performance is reported when testing on five different experimental trials. When ML models are trained on original and augmented datasets, they achieve an accuracy of 95% and 99% on test datasets, respectively. We also provide information on how dataset size affects model performance. Lastly, we investigate the optimal Mixup parameters for augmentation in the context of CNN performance.

Indexed as

Additive manufacturingConvolutional neural networksDeep learningHigh-throughput dataImbalanced learningPore formation

Identifiers

PMID38862686
PMCPMC11166652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.