Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38862673›Full record

ReviewMolecular psychiatry2024

Neuropsychobiology of fear-induced bradycardia in humans: progress and pitfalls.

Simone Battaglia, Claudio Nazzi, Tina B Lonsdorf, Julian F Thayer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simone BattagliaCenter for Studies and Research in Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4133-654X
Claudio NazziCenter for Studies and Research in Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2663-1057
Tina B LonsdorfDepartment of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1501-4846
Julian F ThayerDepartment of Psychological Science, 4201 Social and Behavioral Sciences Gateway, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. jfthayer@uci.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last century, the paradigm of fear conditioning has greatly evolved in a variety of scientific fields. The techniques, protocols, and analysis methods now most used have undergone a progressive development, theoretical and technological, improving the quality of scientific productions. Fear-induced bradycardia is among these techniques and represents the temporary deceleration of heart beats in response to negative outcomes. However, it has often been used as a secondary measure to assess defensive responding to threat, along other more popular techniques. In this review, we aim at paving the road for its employment as an additional tool in fear conditioning experiments in humans. After an overview of the studies carried out throughout the last century, we describe more recent evidence up to the most contemporary research insights. Lastly, we provide some guidelines concerning the best practices to adopt in human fear conditioning studies which aim to investigate fear-induced bradycardia.

Indexed as

BradycardiaFearConditioning, ClassicalConditioning, PsychologicalHeart RateHumans

Identifiers

PMID38862673
PMCPMC11609102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.