Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38862460›Full record

ArticleNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University2024

[Expert consensus on standardized clinical applications of minimally invasive tooth extraction techniques].

B Jia, Q Wang, J Chen, G Zheng, S Fan, Q Ye, Y He, F Zhang, Y Wu, F Liu and 4 more

Abstract readEnglish AbstractConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

B JiaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China.
Q WangDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China.
J ChenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China.
G ZhengDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatology Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510055, China.
S FanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Q YeStomatology Center, People's Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
Y HeDepartment of Stomatology, Tianyou Hospital of Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
F ZhangDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China.
Y WuDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Stomatology of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550001, China.
F LiuDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha 410018, China.
K OuyangDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University School, Guangzhou 510160, China.
L ZhangDepartment of Stomatology, Nangfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
X LvDepartment of Stomatology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China.
J ZhaoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shenzhen Stomatology Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tooth extraction is a common and widely employed therapeutic procedure in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Minimally invasive tooth extraction can reduce both physical and psychological trauma to the patients, and is widely recommended as a first-line clinical treatment. But currently no guidelines or consensus has been available to provide a systematic introduction of minimally invasive tooth extraction to guide the clinical practices. To address this issue, this consensus, based on a comprehensive literature review and clinical experiences of experts, systematically summarizes the indications, target patients, and contraindications of minimally invasive tooth extraction, the overall workflow of this procedure (preoperative preparation, surgical steps, postoperative management, postoperative instructions, medications, and follow-up), and its common postoperative complications to provide a comprehensive guidance for clinical application of this technique.

Indexed as

ConsensusMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresTooth ExtractionHumansPostoperative Complicationsexpert consensusminimally invasive tooth extractionoperation procedurestandardization

Identifiers

PMID38862460
PMCPMC11166731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.