Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38862391›Full record

ArticleJournal of educational evaluation for health professions2024

Development of examination objectives for the Korean paramedic and emergency medical technician examination: a survey study.

Tai-Hwan Uhm, Heakyung Choi, Seok Hwan Hong, Hyungsub Kim, Minju Kang, Keunyoung Kim, Hyejin Seo, Eunyoung Ki, Hyeryeong Lee, Heejeong Ahn and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tai-Hwan UhmDepartment of Paramedicine, Eulji University, Seongnam, Korea.
Heakyung ChoiDepartment of Paramedicine, Eulji University, Seongnam, Korea.
Seok Hwan HongDepartment of Paramedicine, Eulji University, Seongnam, Korea.
Hyungsub KimDepartment of Paramedicine, Eulji University, Seongnam, Korea.
Minju KangDepartment of Paramedicine, Kyungil University, Gyongsan, Korea.
Keunyoung KimDepartment of Paramedicine, Jeonju Kijeon College, Jeonju, Korea.
Hyejin SeoDepartment of Paramedicine, Daegu Health College, Daegu, Korea.
Eunyoung KiDepartment of Paramedicine, Ansan University, Ansan, Korea.
Hyeryeong LeeDepartment of Physiology, Institute of Functional Genomics, & Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, Korea .
Heejeong AhnDepartment of Paramedicine, Yeonsung University, Anyang, Korea.
Uk-jin ChoiDepartment of Paramedicine, Seojeong University, Yangju, Korea.
Sang Woong ParkDepartment of Paramedicine, Eulji University, Seongnam, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe duties of paramedics and emergency medical technicians (P&EMTs) are continuously changing due to developments in medical systems. This study presents evaluation goals for P&EMTs by analyzing their work, especially the tasks that new P&EMTs (with less than 3 years’ experience) find difficult, to foster the training of P&EMTs who could adapt to emergency situations after graduation.

methodsA questionnaire was created based on prior job analyses of P&EMTs. The survey questions were reviewed through focus group interviews, from which 253 task elements were derived. A survey was conducted from July 10, 2023 to October 13, 2023 on the frequency, importance, and difficulty of the 6 occupations in which P&EMTs were employed.

resultsThe P&EMTs’ most common tasks involved obtaining patients’ medical histories and measuring vital signs, whereas the most important task was cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The task elements that the P&EMTs found most difficult were newborn delivery and infant CPR. New paramedics reported that treating patients with fractures, poisoning, and childhood fever was difficult, while new EMTs reported that they had difficulty keeping diaries, managing ambulances, and controlling infection.

conclusionCommunication was the most important item for P&EMTs, whereas CPR was the most important skill. It is important for P&EMTs to have knowledge of all tasks; however, they also need to master frequently performed tasks and those that pose difficulties in the field. By deriving goals for evaluating P&EMTs, changes could be made to their education, thereby making it possible to train more capable P&EMTs.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementEmergency Medical TechniciansAdultCardiopulmonary ResuscitationCommunicationEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleParamedicsRepublic of KoreaSurveys and QuestionnairesAmbulancesCardiopulmonary resuscitationEmergency medical techniciansParamedicsRepublic of Korea

Identifiers

PMID38862391
PMCPMC11239538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.