Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38862235›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2024

Quality improvement initiative to standardise the anthropometric assessment for children under the age of 5 years at an urban primary health centre in New Delhi.

Adhish Kumar Sethi, Sumna Velarambath Manalil, Sandeep Das, Shahana Singh, Roshan Mariam Manu, Riya Biswas, Pranav Shankar, Parshav Gilhotra, Ravneet Kaur, Baridalyne Nongkynrih

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adhish Kumar SethiCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sumna Velarambath ManalilCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India sumnanandanam@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9722-7137
Sandeep DasCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Shahana SinghCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Roshan Mariam ManuCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Riya BiswasCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Pranav ShankarCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Parshav GilhotraCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ravneet KaurCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Baridalyne NongkynrihCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnthropometric assessment in the paediatric population is particularly important to assess the child's general health status, nutritional adequacy, and growth and developmental pattern. However, there are often shortcomings in the quality of anthropometric assessment done in primary healthcare settings despite the presence of established guidelines. In this study, we plan to use the quality improvement (QI) principles to improve the anthropometric assessment of under-5 children attending an urban primary health centre in Delhi, India.

methodsThe study was conducted from December 2022 to February 2023. A baseline assessment was conducted to identify the gaps in the anthropometric measurement of under-5 children visiting the outpatient department. A QI team consisting of doctors and key health staff of urban health centre as its members was formed. A root cause analysis of the identified problems was done and changes were planned and implemented in a Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle.

resultsThere was a marked improvement in the quality of anthropometric measurements, particularly in length measurement for children <24 months of age (0% at baseline vs 81.0% at end-line). However, the improvement in weight measurement of children less than 5 years was lesser (16.2% at baseline vs 44.6% at end-line).

conclusionAnthropometric assessment of under-5 children can be standardised through the involvement of all stakeholders and capacity building of the concerned healthcare providers, using the QI approach. Repeated assessments are required to ensure the sustainability of the change.

Indexed as

AnthropometryPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMalePaediatricsPDSAPrimary careQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID38862235
PMCPMC11168152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.