ArticleBMJ open2024
Utility, acceptability and applicability of a nucleic acid amplification test in comparison with a syndromic approach in the management of sexually transmitted diseases at Mulago National Referral Hospital in Uganda (ASTRHA): protocol for an open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05994495 (Utility, Acceptability and Applicability of a Nucleic Acid Amplification Test), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Utility, Acceptability and Applicability of a Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) in Comparison With Syndromic Approach in the Management of Sexually Transmitted Diseases at Mulago National Referral Hospital in Uganda
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are a major cause of long-term disability. Urethral discharge syndrome (UDS), abnormal vaginal discharge (AVD) and genital ulcer disease (GUD) are very common in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), where, due to lack of resources, these infections are managed according to a syndromic approach. Although microbiological diagnosis using nuclear acid amplification tests (NAAT) is already a standard to prescribe targeted treatments in industrialised countries, no randomised clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate clinical usefulness and acceptability of NAAT in comparison with syndromic approach in LMICs. The results of this study could inform diagnostic guidelines since they may suggest an update of the current recommendation if microbiological diagnosis using NAAT in the management of STD is demonstrated to be both useful and acceptable in an LMIC context. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The primary objective of this randomised, open-label trial is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of a NAAT and its acceptability in comparison with a clinical syndromic approach and to explore whether this test could replace the syndromic approach in the management of STDs at a national referral hospital in Uganda. 220 patients presenting to the STD clinic at Mulago Hospital in Kampala, Uganda with AVD, UDS or GUD will be randomised to either standard of care (syndromic management) or NAAT-based treatment with a 1:1 ratio. All the patients will be asked to return after 2 or 3 weeks for a control visit. Primary outcome will be therapeutic appropriateness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial was approved by the Mulago Hospital Research and Ethical Committee (MHREC2023-97) and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (HS31000ES). Patients will give informed consent to participate before taking part in the study. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals in open-access formats and data made available in anonymised form. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05994495.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.