Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38862176›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2024

Reinforcement expectation in the honeybee (

Shawn Mahoney, Jay Hosler, Brian H Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cognitive limits of larvalLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shawn MahoneySchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-4501, USA.
Jay HoslerDepartment of Biology, Juniata College, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania 16652, USA.
Brian H SmithSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-4501, USA brian.h.smith@asu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7018-8561

Funding

Multiscale model of exploration-exploitation tradeoff: from genes to collectivesR01GM113967 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI SMITH, BRIAN H. · 2015 to 2018
$1.9M
CRCNS: Switching antennal lobe dynamic regime via olfactory and mechanical signalR01DC020892 · NIDCD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI BAZHENOV, MAKSIM V, LEI, HONG · 2022 to 2024
$1.1M
National Science Foundation 2014217National Science Foundation 2113179NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020892NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM113967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When animals learn the association of a conditioned stimulus (CS) with an unconditioned stimulus (US), later presentation of the CS invokes a representation of the US. When the expected US fails to occur, theoretical accounts predict that conditioned inhibition can accrue to any other stimuli that are associated with this change in the US. Empirical work with mammals has confirmed the existence of conditioned inhibition. But the way it is manifested, the conditions that produce it, and determining whether it is the opposite of excitatory conditioning are important considerations. Invertebrates can make valuable contributions to this literature because of the well-established conditioning protocols and access to the central nervous system (CNS) for studying neural underpinnings of behavior. Nevertheless, although conditioned inhibition has been reported, it has yet to be thoroughly investigated in invertebrates. Here, we evaluate the role of the US in producing conditioned inhibition by using proboscis extension response conditioning of the honeybee (

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalInhibition, PsychologicalReinforcement, PsychologyAnimalsBeesBehavior, AnimalOdorants

Identifiers

PMID38862176
PMCPMC11199939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.