ArticleOpen biology2024
Effective training of nanopore callers for epigenetic marks with limited labelled data.
Article in Open biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-read sequencing technologies and bioinformatics: a new perspective for decoding DNA methylation modifications.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Write and Read: Harnessing Synthetic DNA Modifications for Nanopore Sequencing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Effective training of nanopore callers for epigenetic marks with limited labelled data.Open biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanopore sequencing platforms combined with supervised machine learning (ML) have been effective at detecting base modifications in DNA such as 5-methylcytosine (5mC) and N6-methyladenine (6mA). These ML-based nanopore callers have typically been trained on data that span all modifications on all possible DNA [Formula: see text]-mer backgrounds-a
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.