Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38861584›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Enhancing stock volatility prediction with the AO-GARCH-MIDAS model.

Ting Liu, Weichong Choo, Matemilola Bolaji Tunde, Cheongkin Wan, Yifan Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ting LiuSchool of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia.
Weichong ChooSchool of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0002-1106-5718
Matemilola Bolaji TundeSchool of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia.
Cheongkin WanFaculty of Accountancy, Department of Economics and Corporate Administration, Finance and Business, Setapak, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-4271-9884
Yifan LiangSchool of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-8123-1043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research has substantiated that the presence of outliers in data usually introduces additional errors and biases, which typically leads to a degradation in the precision of volatility forecasts. However, correcting outliers can mitigate these adverse effects. This study corrects the additive outliers through a weighting method and let these corrected values to replace the original outliers. Then, the model parameters are re-estimated based on this new return series. This approach reduces the extent to which outliers distort volatility estimates, allowing the model to better adapt to market conditions and improving the accuracy of volatility forecasts. This study introduces this approach for the first time to generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity mixed data sampling (GARCH-MIDAS) models, so as to establish an additional outliers corrected GARCH-MIDAS model (AO-GARCH-MIDAS). This pioneering approach marks a unique innovation. The research employs a diverse array of evaluation methods to validate the model's robustness and consistently demonstrates its dependable performance. Findings unequivocally reveal the substantial influence of outliers on the model's predictive capacity, with the AO-GARCH-MIDAS model exhibiting consistent superiority across all evaluation criteria. Additionally, while the GARCH model showcases stronger estimation capabilities compared to the GARCH-MIDAS model, the latter demonstrates heightened predictive prowess. Notably, regarding variable selection, the results underscore the greater predictive informational value inherent in realized volatility over other low-frequency factors.

Indexed as

InvestmentsForecastingHumansModels, EconomicModels, Statistical

Identifiers

PMID38861584
PMCPMC11166318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.