Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38861576›Full record

ReviewPLOS global public health2024

Relational community engagement within health interventions at varied outcome scales.

Nicole Redvers, Asiya Odugleh-Kolev, Joanna Paula Cordero, Felicia Zerwas, Natalie Mariam Zitoun, Yasaman Mohammadi Kamalabadi, Amy Stevens, Ahimza Nagasivam, Paul Cheh, Emma Callon and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. "What I do not see and others see in me": mutual aid for suicide recovery in Colombia.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nicole RedversSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8521-2130
Asiya Odugleh-KolevDepartment of Integrated Health Services, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Joanna Paula CorderoHealth Promotion and Social Determinants of Health Unit (HPD), World Health Organization African Regional Office, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo.
Felicia ZerwasDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8573-7447
Natalie Mariam ZitounSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Yasaman Mohammadi KamalabadiSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Amy StevensSchool of Public Health, Yorkshire and the Humber Postgraduate Deanery, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9868-9058
Ahimza NagasivamSchool of Public Health, Health Education England, London, United Kingdom.
Paul ChehThe Equity Initiative, China Medical Board Foundation, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8270-9794
Emma CallonDivision of Healthy Environments and Populations, World Health Organization Western Pacific Regional Office, Manila, Philippines.
Katthyana Aparicio-ReyesDepartment of Integrated Health Services, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Shogo KubotaMaternal Child Health and Quality Safety, World Health Organization Western Pacific Regional Office, Manila, Philippines.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relational community engagement may be a powerful approach with multiple health outcomes. Relational community engagement has the potential to promote health and involves collaborative efforts between multiple stakeholders. The COVID-19 pandemic further highlighted the centrality of community engagement in health crises. Challenges continue to persist, however, in genuinely engaging and empowering communities for better health outcomes. Understanding the multi-level and complex relational nature of community engagement is essential to comprehend its influence on health at micro, meso, and macro scales of influence. The purpose of this narrative review was to synthesize the literature on relational community engagement within varied health interventions at the three major system levels (micro, meso, and macro) to support the development of future research agendas. At the micro level, relational community engagement interventions demonstrated a range of positive outcomes including: increased sense of control, satisfaction, positive behavior, improved knowledge, behavior change, empowerment, and overall positive health and social outcomes. At the meso level, relational community engagement interventions resulted in increased trust between stakeholders and groups/teams, and increased community senses of ownership of interventions, decisions, structures. At the macro level, relational community engagement interventions influenced broader societal factors and had positive impacts on health policy and governance including collaboration between sectors and communities as well as increased access to services. The review highlights the potential versatility and effectiveness of interventions that prioritize relationships, health promotion, and social change while underscoring the significance of holistic and community-centered approaches in addressing diverse health and social challenges.

Identifiers

PMID38861576
PMCPMC11166349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.