Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38861453›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2024

Memory for Conversation in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Feasibility Study and Preliminary Findings.

Emily L Morrow, Sarah Brown-Schmidt, Melissa C Duff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily L MorrowDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0003-4629-2283
Sarah Brown-SchmidtDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-5647-0875
Melissa C DuffDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0003-1759-3634

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002245 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Julie A. Bastarache · 2017 to 2026
$9.3M
Language processing in context in individuals with Alzheimer’s diseaseR01DC017926 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Sarah Brown-Schmidt, Melissa C Duff · 2020 to 2026
$5.2M
Learning Health System training program: PROgRESS--Patient/ pRactice Outcomes and Research in Effectiveness and Systems ScienceT32HS026122 · AHRQ · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GRIJALVA, CARLOS G, ROUMIE, CHRISTIANNE L. · 2018 to 2024
$3.5M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS026122NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002245NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite common clinical complaints about memory for conversation after traumatic brain injury (TBI), the nature and severity of this deficit are unknown. In this research note, we report feasibility and preliminary data from a new conversation memory study protocol.

methodParticipants in this feasibility study were 10 pairs, each including an adult with chronic, moderate-to-severe TBI and their chosen familiar conversation partner. The experiment began with a naturalistic conversation between participants with TBI and their conversation partners. After a filled delay, participants next completed verbal recall for the conversation, which we transcribed and coded for their accuracy relative to the original conversation. Participants also read chosen statements from their original conversation and predicted what each partner would remember in a week. One week later, participants completed a posttest about who said each of the chosen statements, allowing direct comparison to their predictions.

resultsWe successfully collected conversation memory data from all 10 pairs, suggesting that this protocol is feasible for future study. In this preliminary sample, people with TBI and their conversation partners did not differ in the accuracy of their recall for the conversation about 20 min after it occurred. When asked to predict their partner's delayed memory, conversation partners were less accurate than participants with TBI because they underestimated how much their partners with TBI would remember.

conclusionMeasuring memory for conversation in TBI is feasible and may advance the characterization of cognitive-communication impairment in TBI, and its heterogeneity, in everyday contexts. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25927513.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticFeasibility StudiesMental RecallAdultFemaleHumansMaleMemory DisordersMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38861453
PMCPMC11253794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.