ArticleThe ISME journal2024
Internal carbon recycling by heterotrophic prokaryotes compensates for mismatches between phytoplankton production and heterotrophic consumption.
Article in The ISME journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular observational tools are useful for characterizing the composition and genetic endowment of microbial communities but cannot measure fluxes, which are critical for the understanding of ecosystems. To overcome these limitations, we used a mechanistic inference approach to estimate dissolved organic carbon (DOC) production and consumption by phytoplankton operational taxonomic units and heterotrophic prokaryotic amplicon sequence variants and inferred carbon fluxes between members of this microbial community from Western English Channel time-series data. Our analyses focused on phytoplankton spring and summer blooms, as well as bacteria summer blooms. In spring blooms, phytoplankton DOC production exceeds heterotrophic prokaryotic consumption, but in bacterial summer blooms heterotrophic prokaryotes consume three times more DOC than produced by the phytoplankton. This mismatch is compensated by heterotrophic prokaryotic DOC release by death, presumably from viral lysis. In both types of summer blooms, large amounts of the DOC liberated by heterotrophic prokaryotes are reused through internal recycling, with fluxes between different heterotrophic prokaryotes being at the same level as those between phytoplankton and heterotrophic prokaryotes. In context, internal recycling accounts for approximately 75% and 30% of the estimated net primary production (0.16 vs 0.22 and 0.08 vs 0.29 μmol l-1 d-1) in bacteria and phytoplankton summer blooms, respectively, and thus represents a major component of the Western English Channel carbon cycle. We have concluded that internal recycling compensates for mismatches between phytoplankton DOC production and heterotrophic prokaryotic consumption, and we encourage future analyses on aquatic carbon cycles to investigate fluxes between heterotrophic prokaryotes, specifically internal recycling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.