ArticleBlood advances2024
CNS bridging radiotherapy achieves rapid cytoreduction before CAR T-cell therapy for aggressive B-cell lymphomas.
Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multicenter randomized phase II study of R-MPV-A chemoimmunotherapy with or without low-dose whole-brain radiotherapy for newly-diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma.Neuro-oncology · 2026Trial
- Advances in targeted and cellular therapies for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: immunotherapeutic strategies and challenges.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Bridging radiotherapy before anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for Large B-cell lymphoma - results from a single-center study.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Celebrating a year of ASH Scholar awardees.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Combining CAR-T therapy with radiotherapy or not in refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A comparative study.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Outcomes of brexucabtagene autoleucel in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia with CNS involvement.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Outcomes of CD19 CAR-T therapy in central nervous system lymphoma: Insights from a multicentre experience.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- CAR T-cell therapy response varies by extranodal disease site in large B-cell lymphoma.Blood cancer journal · 2025Article
- A Novel Therapeutic Strategy for Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Integrating Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy and Gamma Knife Radiation.Journal of hematology · 2025Article
- Whole brain radiotherapy combined with CART-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory central nervous system B-cell lymphoma.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- The contemporary spectrum of radiotherapy for hematologic malignancies involving the central nervous system: From focal therapy to craniospinal.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2025Review
- Urgent and emergent radiotherapy for hematologic malignancies of the central nervous system: a review of the literature and practical approach.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Evolving consolidation patterns and outcomes for a large cohort of patients with primary CNS lymphoma.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Bridging radiotherapy before CAR-T therapy in CNS lymphoma.Blood advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (CART) for central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is a promising strategy, yet responses are frequently not durable. Bridging radiotherapy (BRT) is used for extracranial lymphoma in which it can improve CART outcomes through cytoreduction of high-risk lesions. We hypothesized that BRT would achieve similar, significant cytoreduction before CART for CNSL (CNS-BRT). We identified patients with CNSL with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma who received CNS-BRT before commercial CART. Cytoreduction from CNS-BRT was calculated as change in lesion size before CART. Twelve patients received CNS-BRT, and the median follow-up among survivors is 11.8 months (interquartile range, 8.5-21.9). Ten patients had CNSL (9 secondary, 1 primary) and 2 patients had epidural disease (evaluable for toxicity). All 10 patients with CNSL had progressive disease at the time of CNS-BRT. Of 12 patients, 1 experienced grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome, and 3 of 12 patients experienced grade ≥3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. CNS-BRT achieved a 74.0% (95% confidence interval, 62.0-86.0) mean reduction in lesion size from baseline (P = .014) at a median of 12 days from BRT completion and before CART infusion. Best CNS response included 8 complete responses, 1 partial response, and 1 progressive disease. Three patients experienced CNS relapse outside the BRT field. Preliminary data suggest CNS-BRT achieves rapid cytoreduction and is associated with a favorable CNS response and safety profile. These data support further study of BRT as a bridging modality for CNSL CART.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.