Improving Outcomes for Women After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Sex-Based Differences in Outcomes Following Mitral Valve Surgery: A Contemporary Analysis From 2 Institutions.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026
   Article
2. U shaped association between fibrinogen and one year mortality in women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.Scientific reports · 2025
   Observational
3. Association of blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio and long-term outcome among women with coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: filling gaps in female.BMC nephrology · 2025
   Observational
4. Long-term mortality after coronary surgery in women patients depend on diabetes and age.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Sex Disparities After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Hospital Quality.2024

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as