Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38861182›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024

Defining the optimal target-to-background ratio to identify positive lymph nodes in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted [

Leonardo Quarta, Elio Mazzone, Donato Cannoletta, Armando Stabile, Simone Scuderi, Francesco Barletta, Vito Cucchiara, Luigi Nocera, Antony Pellegrino, Daniele Robesti and 10 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Actionable Feedback on Signal-to-Background Ratios During Drop-in Radioguided Surgery.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Leonardo Quarta *Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Elio Mazzone *Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Donato CannolettaDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Armando StabileDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Simone ScuderiDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Francesco BarlettaDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Vito CucchiaraDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Luigi NoceraDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Antony PellegrinoDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Daniele RobestiDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Riccardo LeniDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Paolo ZauritoDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio BrembillaDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Francesco De CobelliDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Ana Maria Samanes GajateDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Maria PicchioDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Arturo ChitiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Francesco MontorsiDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alberto BrigantiDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio GandagliaDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. gandaglia.giorgio@hsr.it.

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health Project GR-2018-12368369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProstate-specific membrane antigen radioguided surgery (PSMA-RGS) might identify lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). The optimal target-to-background (TtB) ratio to define RGS positivity is still unknown. MATERIALS &

methodsAd interim analyses which focused on 30 patients with available pathological information were conducted. All patients underwent preoperative PSMA positron emission tomography (PET). 99m-Technetium-PSMA imaging and surgery ([

resultsOverall, 9 (30%) patients had LNI, with 22 (13%) and 80 (11%) positive regions and lymph nodes, respectively. PSMA-RGS showed uptakes in 12 (40%) vs. 7 (23%) vs. 6 (20%) patients for a TtB ratio ≥ 2 vs. ≥ 3 vs. ≥ 4. At a per-region level, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for a TtB ratio ≥ 2 vs. ≥ 3 vs. ≥ 4 were 72%, 88% and 87% vs. 54%, 98% and 92% vs. 36%, 99% and 91%. Performing ePLND only in patients with suspicious spots at PSMA PET (n = 7) would have spared 77% ePLNDs at the cost of missing 13% (n = 3) pN1 patients. A TtB ratio ≥ 2 at RGS identified 8 (24%) suspicious areas not detected by PSMA PET, of these 5 (63%) harbored LNI, with one pN1 patient (11%) that would have been missed by PSMA PET. Adoption of a TtB ratio ≥ 2 vs. ≥ 3 vs. ≥ 4, would have allowed to spare 18 (60%) vs. 23 (77%) vs. 24 (80%) ePLNDs missing 2 (11%) vs. 3 (13%) vs. 4 (17%) pN1 patients.

conclusionsPSMA-RGS using a TtB ratio ≥ 2 to identify suspicious nodes, could allow to spare > 50% ePLNDs and would identify additional pN1 patients compared to PSMA PET and higher TtB ratios.

Indexed as

Lymphatic MetastasisProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, SurfaceGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIHumansLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedOrganotechnetium CompoundsProspective StudiesRadiopharmaceuticalsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgery, Computer-AssistedAntigens, SurfaceFOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIOrganotechnetium CompoundsRadiopharmaceuticalsLymph node dissectionLymph node metastasesProstate cancerProstate-specific membrane antigenRadioguided surgeryStaging

Identifiers

PMID38861182
PMCPMC11445289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.