Observational studyEuropean radiology2024
Cerebral collaterals are associated with pre-treatment brain-blood barrier permeability in acute ischemic stroke patients.
Observational study in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Collateral Circulation on Poststroke Epilepsy After Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large Vessel Occlusive Stroke: A Multicenter Cohort Study.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTo investigate the relationship between collaterals and blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability on pre-treatment MRI in a cohort of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with thrombectomy.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of the HIBISCUS-STROKE cohort, a single-center observational study that enrolled patients treated with thrombectomy from 2016 to 2022. Dynamic-susceptibility MRIs were post-processed to generate K2 maps with arrival-time correction, which were co-registered with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. The 90th percentile of K2 was extracted from the infarct core-defined by an ADC ≤ 620 × 10
resultsOut of 249 enrolled, 101 (40.6%) were included (median age: 72.0 years, 52.5% of males, median NIHSS score at admission: 15.0). Patients with poor collaterals (n = 44) had worse NIHSS scores (median: 16.0 vs 13.0, p = 0.04), larger infarct core volumes (median: 43.7 mL vs 9.5 mL, p < 0.0001), and higher increases in K2 (median: 346.3% vs 152.7%, p = 0.003). They were less likely to achieve successful recanalization (21/44 vs 51/57, p < 0.0001) and experienced more frequent hemorrhagic transformation (16/44 vs 9/57, p = 0.03). On multiple variable analysis, poor collaterals were associated with larger infarct cores (odds ratio (OR) = 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): [1.07, 1.17], p < 0.0001) and higher increases in K2 (OR = 6.63, 95% CI: [2.19, 20.08], p = 0.001).
conclusionPoor collaterals are associated with larger infarct cores and increased BBB permeability at admission MRI. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Poor collaterals are associated with a larger infarct core and increased BBB permeability at admission MRI of AIS patients treated with thrombectomy. These findings may have translational interests for extending thrombolytic treatment eligibility and developing neuroprotective strategies. KEY POINTS: In AIS, collaterals and BBB disruption have been both linked to hemorrhagic transformation. Poor collaterals were associated with larger ischemic cores and increased BBB permeability on pre-treatment MRI. These findings could contribute to hemorrhagic transformation risk stratification, thereby refining clinical decision-making for reperfusion therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38861162What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.