Observational studyDoklady. Biochemistry and biophysics2024
Schnitzler's Syndrome-Diagnostic Experience, Approaches to Therapy, and Patient Management according to a Multicenter Russian Cohort.
Observational study in Doklady. Biochemistry and biophysics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Background and Clinical Features of a Unique and Mysterious Autoinflammatory Disease, Schnitzler Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objectives of the study were to present the experience of diagnosis, management, and therapy with IL-1 inhibitors in patients with Schnitzler's syndrome (SchS) according to a multicenter Russian cohort. An observational retrospective study for a 10-year period (2012-2022) involved 17 patients with SchS who were admitted to the hospital or were observed on an outpatient basis (eight women and nine men). The diagnosis of all of them corresponded to the Strasbourg diagnostic criteria. The age of patients ranged from 25 to 81 years (Me 53[46; 56]). The age at the time of the onset of the disease ranged from 20 to 72 years (Me 46[39; 54]), the duration of the disease before diagnosis ranged from 1 to 35 years (Me 6.5[3; 6]), in three patients it exceeded 10 years, in the rest it ranged from 1 to 8 years. Infectious and lymphoproliferative diseases, monogenic AIDs (CAPS, TRAPS, and HIDS) were excluded from all patients at the prehospital stage. The referral diagnosis for all of them was Still 's disease in adults. Clinical manifestations of the disease in all patients included fatigue, lethargy, fatigue, rash, and fever. In all patients, skin elements were urticular and were accompanied by itching in 6 (37.5%) patients. Bone pain was observed in 12 (70.6%) patients; arthralgias, in 16 (94.1%); arthritis, in 9 (52.9%); myalgia, in 7 (41.2%); and weight loss, in 4 (23.5%). Lymphadenopathy was detected in 6 (35.3%) patients; enlarged liver, in 6 (35.3%); pericarditis, in 4 (23.5%); angioedema, in 6 (35.3); redness and dryness in the eyes, in 3 (17.6%); sore throat, in 2 (11.8%); abdominal pain, in 1 (5.9%), distal polyneuropathy, in 2 (11.8%); paraesthesia, in 1 (5.9%); and chondritis of the auricles, in 1 (5.9%). Monoclonal gammopathy was detected in all patients with a secretion level of 2.9-15.1 g/L: IgMk (n = 10, 64.7%), less often IgMλ (n = 2), IgGk (n = 2), IgGλ (n = 1), and IgAλ (n = 1). Ben-Jones protein was not detected in any of them. All patients had an increased level of ESR and CRP. Before inclusion in the study, 16 patients received GCs (94.1%) with a temporary effect that disappeared with dose reduction or cancellation. Seven patients received cDMARDs, including methotrexate (5), hydroxychloroquine (2), and cyclophosphamide (1). All patients received NSAIDs and antihistamines, as well as biologics, including the anti-B-cell drug rituximab (1), monoclonal ABs to IgE omalizumab (2, 1 without effect and 1 with partial effect), IL-1i canakinumab (n = 10, 58.8%) subcutaneously once every 8 weeks, and anakinra (n = 4, 23.5%) subcutaneously daily. The duration of taking anakinra, which was prescribed in the test mode, ranged from 1 week to 2.5 months with a further switch to canakinumab in 3 patients. The duration of taking canakinumab at the time of analysis ranged from 7 months to 8 years. Against the background of treatment with IL-1i, 10 out of 11 (90.9%) patients received a complete response in terms of the clinical manifestations of the disease and a decrease in the level of ESR and CRP within a few days. In one patient, a partial response to the administration of anakinra was detected; however, after switching to canakinumab, the effect of treatment was finally lost. One patient received IL-6i for 8 months with an incomplete effect and a positive dynamics after switching to anakinra. Thus, anakinra was initially prescribed to four patients and changed to canakinumab in two of them; canakinumab was started as the first drug in seven patients. Treatment with anakinra was continued in two patients; with canakinumab, in nine patients. In one patient, due to the persistent absence of relapses, the interval between canakinumab injections was increased to 5 months without signs of reactivation; however, subsequently, against the background of stress and relapses of the disease, the intervals were reduced to 4 months. A healthy child was born by the same patient on the background of treatment. The tolerability of therapy was satisfactory in all patients, no SAEs were noted. SchS is a rare multifactorial/non-monogenic AID that should be differentiated from a number of rheumatic diseases and other AIDs. The onset in adulthood, the presence of recurrent urticarial rashes in combination with fever and other manifestations of a systemic inflammatory response are indications for examination for monoclonal secretion. The use of short- or long-acting IL-1i is a highly effective and safe option in the treatment of such patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38861148What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.