ArticleRadiological physics and technology2024
Deep learning-based correction for time truncation in cerebral computed tomography perfusion.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging requires complete acquisition of contrast bolus inflow and washout in the brain parenchyma; however, time truncation undoubtedly occurs in clinical practice. To overcome this issue, we proposed a three-dimensional (two-dimensional + time) convolutional neural network (CNN)-based approach to predict missing CTP image frames at the end of the series from earlier acquired image frames. Moreover, we evaluated three strategies for predicting multiple time points. Seventy-two CTP scans with 89 frames and eight slices from a publicly available dataset were used to train and test the CNN models capable of predicting the last 10 image frames. The prediction strategies were single-shot prediction, recursive multi-step prediction, and direct-recursive hybrid prediction.Single-shot prediction predicted all frames simultaneously, while recursive multi-step prediction used prior predictions as input for subsequent steps, and direct-recursive hybrid prediction employed separate models for each step with prior predictions as input for the next step. The accuracies of the predicted image frames were evaluated in terms of image quality, bolus shape, and clinical perfusion parameters. We found that the image quality metrics were superior when multiple CTP images were predicted simultaneously rather than recursively. The bolus shape also showed the highest correlation (r = 0.990, p < 0.001) and the lowest variance (95% confidence interval, -453.26-445.53) in the single-shot prediction. For all perfusion parameters, the single-shot prediction had the smallest absolute differences from ground truth. Our proposed approach can potentially minimize time truncation errors and support the accurate quantification of ischemic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38861134What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.