Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38861035›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2024

Long-term outcomes of ADEM-like and tumefactive presentations of CNS demyelination: a case-comparison analysis.

Simon V Arnett, Kerri Prain, Sudarshini Ramanathan, Sandeep Bhuta, Fabienne Brilot, Simon A Broadley

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simon V ArnettSchool of Medicine, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Gold Coast Campus, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, 4222, Australia. Simon.arnett@health.qld.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4582-1171
Kerri PrainDepartment of Immunology, Pathology Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Sudarshini RamanathanNeuroimmunology Group, Kids Neurosciences Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Children's Hospital at Westmead, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0294-9768
Sandeep BhutaDepartment of Neurology, Concord Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2139, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7292-9658
Fabienne BrilotNeuroimmunology Group, Kids Neurosciences Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Children's Hospital at Westmead, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7025-2276
Simon A BroadleySchool of Medicine, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Gold Coast Campus, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, 4222, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9429-4307

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A minority of initial multiple sclerosis (MS) presentations clinically or radiologically resemble other central nervous system (CNS) pathologies, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) or tumefactive demyelination (atypical demyelination presentations). With the aim of better defining the long-term outcomes of this group we have performed a retrospective cohort comparison of atypical demyelination versus 'typical' MS presentations. Twenty-seven cases with atypical presentations (both first and subsequent demyelinating events) were identified and compared with typical MS cases. Disease features analysed included relapse rates, disability severity, whole brain and lesion volumes, lesion number and distribution. Atypical cases represented 3.9% of all MS cases. There was considerable overlap in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of ADEM-like and tumefactive demyelination cases. ADEM-like cases tended to be younger but not significantly so. Atypical cases showed a trend towards higher peak expanded disability severity score (EDSS) score at the time of their atypical presentation. Motor, cranial nerve, cerebellar, cerebral and multifocal presentations were all more common in atypical cases, and less likely to present with optic neuritis. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white cell counts were higher in atypical cases (p = 0.002). One atypical case was associated with peripheral blood myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies, but subsequent clinical and radiological course was in keeping with MS. There was no difference in long-term clinical outcomes including annualised relapse rates (ARR), brain volume, lesion numbers or lesion distributions. Atypical demyelination cases were more likely to receive high potency disease modifying therapy early in the course of their illness. Despite the severity of initial illness, our cohort analysis suggests that atypical demyelination presentations do not confer a higher risk of long-term adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

Encephalomyelitis, Acute DisseminatedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrainCohort StudiesDemyelinating DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAcute disseminated encephalomyelitisMultiple sclerosisPrognosisTumefactive

Identifiers

PMID38861035
PMCPMC11319424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.