ReviewCurrent medicinal chemistry2025
Smart Cancer Nanomedicine for Synergetic Therapy.
Review in Current medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can therapeutic potency of a cancer nanomedicine be predicted by pain-related behavioral test in subcutaneous tumor model?International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Mesoporous silica nanoparticle-based nanomedicine: Preparation, functional modification, and theranostic applications.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer is the second leading cause of death. Notwithstanding endeavors to comprehend tumor causes and therapeutic modalities, no noteworthy advancements in cancer therapy have been identified. Nanomedicine has drawn interest for its diagnostic potential because of its ability to deliver therapeutic agents specifically to tumors with little adverse effects. Nanomedicines have become prevalent in the treatment of cancer. Here, we present four strategic suggestions for improvement in the functionality and use of nanomedicine. (1) Smart drug selection is a prerequisite for both medicinal and commercial achievement. Allocating resources to the advancement of modular (pro)drugs and nanocarrier design ought to consider the role of opportunistic decisions depending on drug availability. (2) Stimuli-responsive nanomedicine for cancer therapy is being designed to release medications at particular locations precisely. (3) The cornerstone of clinical cancer treatment is combination therapy. Nanomedicines should be included more frequently in multimodal combination therapy regimens since they complement pharmacological and physical co-treatments. (4) Regulation by the immune system is transforming cancer therapy. Nanomedicines can improve the effectiveness of the immune system and control the behavior of anticancer immunity. These four approaches, both separately and particularly in combination, will accelerate and promote the creation of effective cancer nanomedicine treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38860907What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.