Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38860884›Full record

ArticleMicrobial genomics2024

PHA4GE quality control contextual data tags: standardized annotations for sharing public health sequence datasets with known quality issues to facilitate testing and training.

Emma J Griffiths, Inês Mendes, Finlay Maguire, Jennifer L Guthrie, Bryan A Wee, Sarah Schmedes, Kathryn Holt, Chanchal Yadav, Rhiannon Cameron, Charlotte Barclay and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Emma J GriffithsCentre for Infectious Disease Genomics and One Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Inês MendesTheiagen Genomics, LLC, Highlands Ranch, Colorado, USA.
Finlay MaguireDepartment of Community Health & Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, and Faculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Jennifer L GuthrieDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Bryan A WeeThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sarah SchmedesNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Georgia, USA.
Kathryn HoltNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Chanchal YadavNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Rhiannon CameronCentre for Infectious Disease Genomics and One Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Charlotte BarclayCentre for Infectious Disease Genomics and One Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Damion DooleyCentre for Infectious Disease Genomics and One Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Duncan MacCannellNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Georgia, USA.
Leonid ChindelevitchDepartment of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ilene Karsch-MizrachiNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Zahra WaheedEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Lee KatzCenter for Food Safety, University of Georgia, Georgia, USA.
Robert Petit IiiWyoming Public Health Laboratory, Wyoming, USA.
Mugdha DaveMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Paul OluniyiChan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Muhammad Ibtisam NasarDepartment of Biology, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University- AL Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Amogelang RaphenyaMichael G. DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
William W L HsiaoCentre for Infectious Disease Genomics and One Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Ruth E TimmeCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, Maryland, USA.

Funding

National Biomedical Information ServicesZIHLM200888 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI PALTOO, DINA · 2009 to 2025
$5200.7M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As public health laboratories expand their genomic sequencing and bioinformatics capacity for the surveillance of different pathogens, labs must carry out robust validation, training, and optimization of wet- and dry-lab procedures. Achieving these goals for algorithms, pipelines and instruments often requires that lower quality datasets be made available for analysis and comparison alongside those of higher quality. This range of data quality in reference sets can complicate the sharing of sub-optimal datasets that are vital for the community and for the reproducibility of assays. Sharing of useful, but sub-optimal datasets requires careful annotation and documentation of known issues to enable appropriate interpretation, avoid being mistaken for better quality information, and for these data (and their derivatives) to be easily identifiable in repositories. Unfortunately, there are currently no standardized attributes or mechanisms for tagging poor-quality datasets, or datasets generated for a specific purpose, to maximize their utility, searchability, accessibility and reuse. The Public Health Alliance for Genomic Epidemiology (PHA4GE) is an international community of scientists from public health, industry and academia focused on improving the reproducibility, interoperability, portability, and openness of public health bioinformatic software, skills, tools and data. To address the challenges of sharing lower quality datasets, PHA4GE has developed a set of standardized contextual data tags, namely fields and terms, that can be included in public repository submissions as a means of flagging pathogen sequence data with known quality issues, increasing their discoverability. The contextual data tags were developed through consultations with the community including input from the International Nucleotide Sequence Data Collaboration (INSDC), and have been standardized using ontologies - community-based resources for defining the tag properties and the relationships between them. The standardized tags are agnostic to the organism and the sequencing technique used and thus can be applied to data generated from any pathogen using an array of sequencing techniques. The tags can also be applied to synthetic (lab created) data. The list of standardized tags is maintained by PHA4GE and can be found at https://github.com/pha4ge/contextual_data_QC_tags. Definitions, ontology IDs, examples of use, as well as a JSON representation, are provided. The PHA4GE QC tags were tested, and are now implemented, by the FDA's GenomeTrakr laboratory network as part of its routine submission process for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance. We hope that these simple, standardized tags will help improve communication regarding quality control in public repositories, in addition to making datasets of variable quality more easily identifiable. Suggestions for additional tags can be submitted to PHA4GE via the New Term Request Form in the GitHub repository. By providing a mechanism for feedback and suggestions, we also expect that the tags will evolve with the needs of the community.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyPublic HealthQuality ControlGenomicsHumansInformation DisseminationMolecular Sequence AnnotationReproducibility of ResultsSoftwarecontextual datadata sharingpublic health genomicsquality controlreference datasets

Identifiers

PMID38860884
PMCPMC11261899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.