Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38860836›Full record

ArticleMedical education2025

Bridging the digital divide: Promoting equal access to online learning for health professions in an unequal world.

Siew Ping Han, Ben Kumwenda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Improving Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Bibliometric Analysis of Related Intervention Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Siew Ping HanLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-4429-9190
Ben KumwendaCentre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1600-8229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Online learning has the potential to enhance open and equitable access to medical education resources globally. Conversely, there are also concerns that it can perpetuate and exacerbate digital inequalities between developed (global North) and developing (global South) countries. In this article, we describe the historical lack of representation of the global South in the design of online medical education, as well as the resulting consequences and potential solutions. We compare the Northern and Southern views of online learning in medical education and identify the different types of barriers to its adoption. We describe how socioeconomic disparities and the historical dominance of the global North over the global South have led to systemic digital inequalities in the design and implementation of online learning in education generally, and in medical education particularly. The lack of representation of global South voices hinders the development of digital learning solutions relevant to local contexts, therefore limiting their effectiveness and sustainability. Thus, we propose approaches to build more equitable partnerships by soliciting local input and local expertise. Further, we discuss the need to maintain local relevance while setting global standards. Overall, we hope to inform and guide the development of more equitable and accessible online education training for a diverse global population.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceEducation, MedicalDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesDigital DivideHealth OccupationsHumansInternetSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID38860836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.