Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38860606›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2024

Biological attributes required for epidermal regeneration: Evaluation of the next-generation autologous cell harvesting device.

Katie A Bush, Ghaidaa Kashgari, Sohail Jahid, Jennifer Hur, Heather M Powell, Niraj Doshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katie A BushAVITA Medical, Inc., Valencia, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0230-7490
Ghaidaa KashgariAVITA Medical, Inc., Valencia, California, USA.
Sohail JahidAVITA Medical, Inc., Valencia, California, USA.
Jennifer HurAVITA Medical, Inc., Valencia, California, USA.
Heather M PowellDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Niraj DoshiAVITA Medical, Inc., Valencia, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early wound intervention and closure is critical for reducing infection and improving aesthetic and functional outcomes for patients with acute burn wounds and nonthermal full-thickness skin defects. Treatment of partial-thickness burns or full-thickness injuries with autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) achieves robust wound closure while limiting the amount of donor skin compared with standard autografting. A Next Generation Autologous Cell Harvesting Device (NG-ACHD) was developed to standardize the preparation process for ASCS to ensure biological attributes are obtained known to correlate with well-established safety and performance data. This study compared ASCS prepared using the NG-ACHD and ACHD following the manufacturer's guidance, evaluating cellular yields, viability, apoptotic activity, aggregates, phenotypes and functional capacity. Non-inferiority was established for all biological attributes tested and comparable healing trajectories were demonstrated using an in vitro skin regeneration model. In addition to standardization, the NG-ACHD also provides workflow efficiencies with the potential to decrease training requirements and increase the ease of incorporation and utilization of ASCS in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Transplantation, AutologousWound HealingBurnsEpidermal CellsEpidermisFemaleHumansMaleRegenerationSkin TransplantationTissue and Organ Harvestingburnscell and tissue based therapycell transplantationregenerationwound healing

Identifiers

PMID38860606
PMCPMC11165398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.