Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38860470›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2024

Social media use by patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.

Colin M E Halverson, Tom A Doyle, Samantha Vershaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Colin M E HalversonDepartment of Medicine, Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Tom A DoyleDepartment of Medicine, Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Samantha VershawDepartment of Medicine, Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Funding

Improving Care for Rare Genetic Diseases: Patient-Provider Communication and Patient Validation in the Ehlers-Danlos SyndromesK01HG012408 · NHGRI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Colin Michael Egenberger Halverson · 2022 to 2026
$836k
NHGRI NIH HHS K01 HG012408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with uncommon genetic conditions often face limited in-person resources for social and informational support. Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) is a rare or underdiagnosed hereditary disorder of the connective tissue, and like those with similar diseases, patients with hEDS have begun to turn to social media in search of care and community. The aims of our study were to understand the usage habits and perceptions of utility of social media use for patients with hEDS in order to formulate suggestions for how clinicians may best engage these and similar patient populations about this topic.

methodsWe conducted both a quantitative survey and qualitative interviews with patients who had received a robust clinical diagnosis of hEDS.

resultsTwenty-four individuals completed the initial survey, and a subset of 21 of those participants completed an interview. Through thematic analysis, we identified four primary themes related to their experience with social media: (1) befriending others with their disease, (2) seeking and vetting information, (3) the risks and downsides of social media use, and (4) the desire for clinicians to discuss this topic with them.

conclusionWe conclude by proposing five suggestions that emerge empirically from our data. These proposals will help clinicians engage their patients regarding social media use in order to promote its potential benefits and circumvent its potential harms as they pursue support for their hereditary condition.

Indexed as

Ehlers-Danlos SyndromeSocial MediaAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedEhlers–Danlos syndromespatient perspectivequalitative researchsocial media

Identifiers

PMID38860470
PMCPMC11165341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.