Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38860225›Full record

ReviewTranslational neuroscience2024

Adaptation of the layer V supraspinal motor corticofugal projections from the primary (M1) and premotor (PM) cortices after CNS motor disorders in non-human primates: A survey.

Eric M Rouiller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eric M RouillerDepartment of Neurosciences and Movement sciences, Section of Medicine, Faculty of Sciences and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Ch. du Musée 5, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1355-6019

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor commands are transmitted from the motor cortical areas to effectors mostly via the corticospinal (CS) projection. Several subcortical motor nuclei also play an important role in motor control, the subthalamic nucleus, the red nucleus, the reticular nucleus and the superior colliculus. These nuclei are influenced by motor cortical areas via respective corticofugal projections, which undergo complex adaptations after motor trauma (spinal cord/motor cortex injury) or motor disease (Parkinson), both in the absence or presence of putative treatments, as observed in adult macaque monkeys. A dominant effect was a nearly complete suppression of the corticorubral projection density and a strong downregulation of the corticoreticular projection density, with the noticeable exception in the latter case of a considerable increase of projection density following spinal cord injury, even enhanced when an anti-NogoA antibody treatment was administered. The effects were diverse and less prominent on the corticotectal and corticosubthalamic projections. The CS projection may still be the major efferent pathway through which motor adaptations can take place after motor trauma or disease. However, the parallel supraspinal motor corticofugal projections may also participate in connectional adaptations supporting the functional recovery of motor abilities, representing potential targets for future clinical strategies, such as selective electrical neurostimulations.

Indexed as

monkeysmotor functional recoverytract tracing

Identifiers

PMID38860225
PMCPMC11163158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.