Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38860215›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pain research2024

Primary 3-Month Outcomes of a Double-Blind Randomized Prospective Study (The QUEST Study) Assessing Effectiveness and Safety of Novel High-Frequency Electric Nerve Block System for Treatment of Post-Amputation Pain.

Leonardo Kapural, Jim Melton, Billy Kim, Priyesh Mehta, Abindra Sigdel, Alexander Bautista, Erika A Petersen, Konstantin V Slavin, John Eidt, Jiang Wu and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02221934 (High-Frequency Nerve Block for Post-Amputation Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02221934 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

High-Frequency Nerve Block for Post-Amputation Pain: A Pivotal Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNeuros Medical, Inc.Ran2014 to 2025Enrolled607ConditionsPost-Amputation Pain, Phantom Limb Pain, Residual Limb Pain, Stump PainArmsAltius
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Leonardo KapuralCarolinas Pain Institute and Center for Clinical Research, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2718-5837
Jim MeltonDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Health Clinic, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Billy KimDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Surgical Clinic, Nashville, TN, USA.
Priyesh MehtaDepartment of Pain Medicine, Meta Medical Research Institute, Dayton, OH, USA.
Abindra SigdelDepartment of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Alexander BautistaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Erika A PetersenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8548-1450
Konstantin V SlavinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7946-8639
John EidtDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Baylor Scott and White Heart and Vascular Hospital Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jiang WuDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6979-4708
Said ElshihabiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Legacy Brain & Spine Surgical Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jason Matthew SchwalbDepartment of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Medical Group, Detroit, MI, USA.
H Edward GarrettDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University of Tennessee-Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Elias VeiziDepartment of Pain Medicine, VA Northeast OH Healthcare System, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Giancarlo BarolatDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barolat Neuroscience, Presbyterian/St Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Ravi R RajaniDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Emory University and Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Peter C RheeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Maged GuirguisDepartment of Interventional Pain Management, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Nagy MekhailDepartment of Pain Management, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active sham-controlled pivotal study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of high-frequency nerve block treatment for chronic post-amputation and phantom limb pain. Patients and Methods: QUEST enrolled 180 unilateral lower-limb amputees with severe post-amputation pain, 170 of whom were implanted with the Altius device, were randomized 1:1 to active-sham or treatment groups and reached the primary endpoint. Responders were those subjects who received ≥50% pain relief 30 min after treatment in ≥50% of their self-initiated treatment sessions within the 3-month randomized period. Differences between the active treatment and sham control groups as well as numerous secondary outcomes were determined. Results: At 30-min, (primary outcome), 24.7% of the treatment group were responders compared to 7.1% of the control group (p=0.002). At 120-minutes following treatment, responder rates were 46.8% in the Treatment group and 22.2% in the Control group (p=0.001). Improvement in Brief Pain Inventory interference score of 2.3 ± 0.29 was significantly greater in treatment group than the 1.3 ± 0.26-point change in the Control group (p = 0.01). Opioid usage, although not significantly different, trended towards a greater reduction in the treatment group than in the control group. The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the treatment and control groups. Conclusion: The primary outcomes of the study were met, and the majority of Treatment patients experienced a substantial improvement in PAP (regardless of meeting the study definition of a responder). The significant in PAP was associated with significantly improved QOL metrics, and a trend towards reduced opioid utilization compared to Control. These data indicate that Altius treatment represents a significant therapeutic advancement for lower-limb amputees suffering from chronic PAP.

Indexed as

high-frequency nerve blockneuromodulationperipheral nerve stimulationphantom limb painpost-amputation pain

Identifiers

PMID38860215
PMCPMC11164212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.