Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38860213›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Baseline haematological parameters in three common Australian frog species.

Tara Jadwani-Bungar, Nicholas P Doidge, Danielle K Wallace, Laura A Brannelly

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tara Jadwani-BungarMelbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Nicholas P DoidgeMelbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Danielle K WallaceMelbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Laura A BrannellyMelbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2975-9494

Funding

Australian Research CouncilUniversity of Melbourne
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amphibians are experiencing declines globally, with emerging infectious diseases as one of the main causes. Haematological parameters present a useful method for determining the health status of animals and the effects of particular diseases, but the interpretation of differential cell counts relies on knowing the normal ranges for the species and factors that can affect these counts. However, there is very little data on either normal haematological parameters or guides for blood cell types for free-ranging frog species across the world. This study aims to 1) create a visual guide for three different Australian frog species:

Indexed as

AnuraAnimalsAustraliaBlood Cell CountErythrocytesHematologic TestsLeukocyte CountMaleReference ValuesSpecies SpecificityBlood countDifferential cell countsFrogHaematological parametersLeukocyteLymphocyte

Identifiers

PMID38860213
PMCPMC11164059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.