Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38860154›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical & translational endocrinology2024

Safety and prescribing recommendations for verapamil in newly diagnosed pediatric type 1 diabetes (T1D): The CLVer experience.

Laya Ekhlaspour, Bruce Buckingham, Colleen Bauza, Mark Clements, Gregory P Forlenza, Anna Neyman, Lisa Norlander, Marcus Schamberger, Jennifer L Sherr, Ryan Bailey and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04233034 (Hybrid Closed Loop Therapy and Verapamil for Beta Cell Preservation in New Onset Type 1 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04233034 phase3completednot on this map

Hybrid Closed Loop Therapy and Verapamil for Beta Cell Preservation in New Onset Type 1 Diabetes (CLVer)

TypeinterventionalSponsorJaeb Center for Health ResearchRan2020 to 2022Enrolled113ConditionsType1 DiabetesArmsHCL, verapamil 120mg tablet, non-HCL, placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Laya EkhlaspourUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Bruce BuckinghamStanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Colleen BauzaJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA.
Mark ClementsChildren's Mercy Hospital-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Gregory P ForlenzaBarbara Davis Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, USA.
Anna NeymanIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Lisa NorlanderStanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Marcus SchambergerIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jennifer L SherrYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ryan BaileyJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA.
Roy W BeckJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA.
Craig KollmanJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA.
Shannon BeasleyUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Erin CobryBarbara Davis Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, USA.
Linda A DiMeglioIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Emily PaprockiChildren's Mercy Hospital-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Michelle Van NameYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Antoinette MoranUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
CLVer Study Group

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Modeling and modulating insulin delivery in automated insulin delivery systems to accommodate for meal compositionsK23DK121942 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI EKHLASPOUR, LAYA · 2020 to 2024
$964k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK121942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To report the safety and side effects associated with taking verapamil for beta-cell preservation in children with newly-diagnosed T1D. Research Design and Methods: Eighty-eight participants aged 8.5 to 17.9 years weighing ≥ 30 kg were randomly assigned to verapamil (N = 47) or placebo (N = 41) within 31 days of T1D diagnosis and followed for 12 months from diagnosis, main CLVer study. Drug dosing was weight-based with incremental increases to full dosage. Side effect monitoring included serial measurements of pulse, blood pressure, liver enzymes, and electrocardiograms (ECGs). At study end, participants were enrolled in an observational extension study (CLVerEx), which is ongoing. No study drug is provided during the extension, but participants may use verapamil if prescribed by their diabetes care team. Results: Overall rates of adverse events were low and comparable between verapamil and placebo groups. There was no difference in the frequency of liver function abnormalities. Three CLVer participants reduced or discontinued medication due to asymptomatic ECG changes. One CLVerEx participant (18 years old), treated with placebo during CLVer, who had not had a monitoring ECG, experienced complete AV block with a severe hypotensive episode 6 weeks after reaching his maximum verapamil dose following an inadvertent double dose on the day of the event. Conclusions: The use of verapamil in youth newly-diagnosed with T1D appears generally safe and well tolerated with appropriate monitoring. We strongly recommend monitoring for potential side effects including an ECG at screening and an additional ECG once full dosage is reached.ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04233034.

Indexed as

ChildrenNewly diagnosedSafetyType 1 diabetesVerapamil

Identifiers

PMID38860154
PMCPMC11163172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.